SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 1639

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, ASHOK BHUSHAN
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Appellant
Versus
VIJAY GHOGRE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG, Mr. R. Balasubramaniam, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR, Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR, Ms. Suvarna D., Advs.
For the Respondents: Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Sr.Adv., Mr. Kumar Parimal, Mr. Smarhar Singh, Mr. Atul Yeshwant Chitale,Sr.Adv., Mr. Gurjyot Sethi, Mr. Tanvi Kakar, Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, AOR, Dr. K.S. Chauhan, Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, Mr. M. Vijaya Bhaskar, AOR, Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR, Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma, AOR, Mr. Nikilesh Ramachandran, AOR, Mr. Shashi Kiran, Mr. Manoj Gorkela, Ms. Priya Sharma, Mr. Prakash Sharma, Mr. Alok Singh, Mr. Pratik R. Bombarde, Advs.

ORDER :

Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned ASG has referred to order dated 17.05.2018 in SLP(C)No. 30621 of 2011.

2. It is made clear that the Union of India is not debarred from making promotions in accordance with law, subject to further orders, pending further consideration of the matter.

3. Tag to SLP(C)No.30621 of 2011.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top