SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 335

A.M.SAPRE, DINESH MAHESHWARI
Gagan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 26.11.2018 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in CRR No.42 of 2018 whereby the Single Judge of the High Court dismissed the revision petition filed by the appellant herein and affirmed the judgment and order of the Courts below.

3. The appeal involves a short controversy as would be clear from the facts set out hereinbelow.

4. The appellant was prosecuted and eventually convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 279 and 304-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) in CHI 88530 of 2013 by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jalandhar by order dated 12.05.2017. On the quantum of sentence, the Judicial Magistrate passed the following order:

Under Section 279 of IPC

To undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for fifteen days.

Under Section 304A of IPC

To undergo rigorous imprisonment for t




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top