SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 1337

S.A.BOBDE, L.NAGESWARA RAO
Shivashankar alias Shiva – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant has preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 22-09-2016 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in Criminal Petition No. 769/2016, refusing to quash the criminal proceedings in C.C. No. 6820/2015 arising out of Crime No. 254/2014, for the offence punishable under sections 376, 420, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, the ‘IPC’).

3. The gravamen of the charge against the appellant-accused is that he has raped respondent no. 2-complainant. We find from the complaint filed by the complainant that respondent no. 2-complainant has lived with the appellant for period of about eight years.

4. Further, respondent no. 2-complainant has stated that the appellant “pretended to have loved me” on the promise of marriage, that he applied the Kumkum on her forehead, and tied the Arishina thread to her neck. She further stated that she has been treating the appellant as her husband for the past eight years, and now he is trying to escape from her and cheat her.

5. Though we are not here concerned with the question whether the appellant and the complainant-respondent no. 1 were, in fact, married, we have no doubt that they lived together



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top