SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 486

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, HEMANT GUPTA
Alka Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Life Insurance Corporation Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. Divya Roy, Advocate,
Ms. Indra Sawhney, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Dr Dhananiava Y Chandrachud, J.

The present appeal arises from a judgement of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission [NCDRC] which reversed the judgment of the Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission [SCDRC]. The SCDRC had affirmed the view of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg [the District Forum] allowing an accident insurance claim.

2. The spouse of the appellant obtained three insurance policies from the Life Insurance Corporation of India [LIC of India]:

(i) New Bima Gold Policy;

(ii) LIC Jeevan Tarang Policy; and

(iii) Twenty Years Money Back Policy with profits and accident benefit.

The details of the policies are tabulated below:

Policy No

Policy Number

Date of Commencement

Total Term

Sum Assured (Rs)

Premium (in Rs)

1

Bima Gold Policy370473369

27.06.1992

75-20

50,000

3188/- yearly

2

LIC New Bima Gold Policy384067139

10.08.2006

178-10

2,00,000

21134/- yearly

3

Twenty Years Money Back Policy (with accident benefit) 385316764

11.01.2008

179-12

2,00,000

7641/- h





















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top