DEEPAK GUPTA, SURYA KANT
MOHINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
ORDER
1. The appellant was convicted for having committed offences punishable under Sections 324 and 326 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. The case of the prosecution is that on 25.04.1994, the appellant attacked his uncle with a spade and gave a blow on the left side of his head. The Trial Court convicted the appellant and sentenced him to undergo three years imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs. 4,000/-. The High Court partly allowed the appeal and while upholding the conviction reduced the sentence to two years and fine of Rs. 4,000/-.
2. We are not inclined to interfere on the merits of the case. At the same time, we cannot lose sight of the fact that the occurrence took place more than a quarter of century back and to send the accused in prison after 25 years, would be travesty of justice.
3. The accused has already undergone more than four months imprisonment and keeping in view the fact that there is so much delay in disposing of this case, we alter the sentence imposed by the High Court to the period of incarceration already undergone by the appellant.
4. We, however, enhance the fine to Rs. 24,000/- (Twenty Four Thousand) and direct that the appellant to deposit the sum of Rs. 20,000/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.