SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 766

ASHOK BHUSHAN, NAVIN SINHA
SANJAY RAJAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :Mr. Prabhash Kr. Yadav, Mr. Mansoor Ali, Ms. Rubina Jawed, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Mr. Saket Singh, Mrs. Niranjana Singh, Ms. Sangeeta Singh, Advocates.

Judgement Key Points

Question 1? What is... Question 2? What is... Question 3? What is...

Key Points: - The court held that mere acquittal of a co-accused can be of no benefit to the appellant. (!) - Failure of police to recover corpus delicti does not automatically render the prosecution case doubtful or entitle the accused to acquittal; it is one of several factors to consider. (!) - In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed, with the conviction under Section 364A IPC upheld and sentence maintained. (!)

Question 1?

What is...

Question 2?

What is...

Question 3?

What is...


JUDGMENT

NAVIN SINHA, J.

The appellant assails his sentence and conviction under Section 364(A) I.P.C to rigorous imprisonment for life with a default stipulation. Co-accused Balram convicted by the Trial Court has been acquitted by the High Court. Consequently, the appellant has been acquitted of the charge under Section 120B I.P.C.

2. The victim, according to the prosecution case was a school going child aged about 5-6 years. According to the allegations, he is said to have been kidnapped from the school on 12.04.2007 at about 12:15 pm. by the co-accused Balram. The appellant and the co-accused were last seen together along with the victim. In their confessional statement both the accused disclosed that after kidnapping the child they had killed him and buried the corpse in the bed of river Saryu at Chhapra. The police did not make any effort to recover the body. The belongings of the deceased victim were recovered from the house of the appellant.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that according to PW-10, the classmate of the deceased, co-accused Balram had kidnapped him from the school. PW-11 and PW-12, the parents of the victim had further deposed that ransom calls wer











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top