D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, INDIRA BANERJEE
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Maruti Suzuki India Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, J.
1. This appeal arises from a judgment of a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dated 9 January 2018 which upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(“the Tribunal”). The Tribunal held that the assessment made in the name of Suzuki Powertrain India Limited(“SPIL”) for Assessment Year(“AY”) 2012-13 is a nullity since the entity had been amalgamated with Maruti Suzuki India Limited(“MSIL”) under an approved scheme of amalgamation and was not in existence. The High Court, while affirming this view of the Tribunal followed its own decision for AY 2011-12 in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – 6, New Delhi v Maruti Suzuki India Limited (successor of SPIL) ((2017) 397 ITR 681 (DEL.)) (“Maruti Suzuki”) . Holding that no question of law arose, the High Court dismissed the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act 1961(“The Act 1961”).
2. The Revenue is in appeal.
3. Against the decision of the High Court for AY 2011-12, a Special Leave Petition(SLP (C) Diary No. 14106 of 2018) was dismissed by a two judge Bench of this Court on 16 July 2018 with the following observations:
“Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Delay condoned.
In v
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.