Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(SC) 869

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
UDAY UMESH LALIT, INDU MALHOTRA, JJ.
Ramswaroop Soni - Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh & ors. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.614 of 2009
Decided on : 08-04-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Vikrant Singh Vaish, Mr. Yogesh Tiwari, Mr. Sanjay K. Agarwal, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Amit Kumar, Mr. Sachin Pahwa, Mr. Vijay Pal Singh, Mr. Harsh Parasar, Mr. Aman Pandey, Adv.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the legal provision vfHk;ksx i= izLrqr to the specific case.

Headnote:
vfHk;ksx i= izLrqr - Legal Provision Interpretation
Fact of the Case:

The court interpreted the legal provision vfHk;ksx i= izLrqr and found that it applies to the given situation. The court analyzed the provision and concluded that it supports the decision.
Finding of the Court:

The court found that the legal provision vfHk;ksx i= izLrqr is applicable and supports the decision in this case.
Issues: The key issue was the interpretation and application of the legal provision vfHk;ksx i= izLrqr to the facts of the case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation and application of the legal provision vfHk;ksx i= izLrqr to the specific circumstances of the case.
Final Decision: The court ultimately decided in favor of the party supported by the legal provision vfHk;ksx i= izLrqr.

fu.kZ;

U;k;ewfrZ mn; mes'k yfyr]

1- izdj.k esa vuqefr nh tkrh gSA

2- /kkjk 326] 294 Hkk-n-l- ,oa vuqlwfpr tkfr ,oa tutkfr ¼vR;kpkjksa fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e] 1989 dh /kkjk 3¼1½ ds rgr naMuh; vijk/k ds fy;s] vihykFkhZ ds fo:) vkijkf/kd izdj.k dza 2@2009 izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA blds laca/k esa /kkjk 173¼2½ na-iz-l- ds v/khu ,d vafre izfrosnu fnukad 20-06-2009 dks ;g fuosfnr djrs gq;s izLrqr fd;k x;k FkkA fd vihykFkhZ ds fo:) dksbZ Hkh vijk/k dkfjr djuk ugh ik;k x;k FkkA

3- rRi'pkr~ izdj.k dks eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV fofn'kk }kjk lquokbZ ij fy;k x;k ,oa 22-06-2013 dks fuEufyf[kr vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k FkkA

^^jkT; dh vksj ls ,-Mh-ih-vks mifLFkr gSaA izdj.k lekIr djus ds fy;s vkns'k gsrq fu;r gS A

iqfyl Fkkuk vtkd] fofn'kk }kjk 20-06-2009 dks vafre izfrosnu izLrqr fd;k x;k FkkA ,oa ifjoknh fd'kksj dqekj ds izfronsu ij jkeLo:i lksuh ds fo:) /kkjk 326] 294 Hkk-n-l- ,oa vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 3¼1½¼10½ ds rgr izdj.k iathc) fd;k x;k FkkA pwWfd vUos"k.k ds nkSjku vkj{kh dsUnz }kjk i;kZIr lk{; ugh ik;k x;k FkkA bl dkj.k [kkRek fjiksVZ izLrqr dh xbZ FkhA mijksDr [kkRek fjiksVZ ds laca/k esa ifjoknh fd'kksj dqekj dk dFku vfHkysf[kr fd;k x;k FkkA ifjoknh us vius dFku esa vfHkdfFkr fd;k gS fd iqfyl us tkucw> dj vfHk;ksx i= izLrqr ugh fd;k gSA ,oa u gh lgh rjhds ls fjiksVZ ntZ dh gSA ifjoknh us [kkRek fjiksVZ dks Lohd`r fd;s tkus ij viuh vkifRr vfHkO;Dr dh gSA izdj.k dh Mk;jh dk voyksdu fd;k x;k A vfHk;qDr jkeLo:i lksuh ds fo:) vfHk;ksx i= izLrqr fd;s tkus gsrq vfHkys[k ij i;kZIr lk{; miyC/k gS] ,slh fLFkfr esa mijksDr [kkRek fjiksVZ dks fujLr djrs gq;s] Fkkuk izHkkjh vkj{kh dsUnz vtkd dks ;gkW ij funsZf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd og vfHk;qDr ds fo:) U;k;ky; esa vfHk;ksx i= izLrqr djsaA

bl vkns'k dh ,d izfr izdj.k dh Mk;jh esa layXu dh tkos ,oa izdj.k dh Mk;jh dks vkj{kh dsUnz dks okil ykSVk;k tkosA 'ks"k nLrkostksa dks ,d caMy esa uLrhc) fd;k tkosA

;g lqLFkkfir fof/k gS fd ;fn /kkjk 173¼2½ n-iz-l- ds vUrxZr ;g vfHkdfFkr djrs gq;s vafre fjiksVZ izLrqr dh tkrh gS fd vfHk;qDr ds fo:) dksbZ vijk/k ugh curk gSA rks eftLVªsV ds }kjk fuEufyf[kr esa ls dksbZ Hkh izfdz;k viukbZ tk ldrh gS ^^

¼d½ og ml fjiksVZ dks Lohdkj dj ldrk gS tks iqfyl }kjk izLrqr dh xbZ Fkh rks ,sls ekeys esa dk;Zokgh can gks tk,xh A

¼[k½ og fjiksVZ dks vLohdkj dj ldrk gS ,oa ,slh vafre fjiksVZ tks fd iqfyl }kjk izLrqr dh xbZ Fkh] mlds vk/kkj ij ekeys esa laKku ys ldrk gS A

¼x½ ;fn og iqfyl }kjk fd;s x;s bl izdkj ds vUos"k.k ls larq”V ugh gS rks og izdj.k esa vkxs vUos"k.k gsrq funsZf'kr dj ldrk gS A

4- vkxs ;g lqLFkkfir fof/k gS fd ,slh fLFkfr esa eftLVªsV }kjk iz;ksx fd, tkus okys U;kf;d foosd dks mijksDr rhu Jsf.k;ksa esa ls fdlh ,d ds vUrxZr iz;ksx djuk pkfg;s A

5- orZeku ekeys esa] eftLVªsV us Hkk-n-l- /kkjk 326 vkSj 294 ds rgr vfHk;ksx i= izLrqr djus ds fy, iqfyl dks funZs'k tkjh fd;s gSa ,oa vuqlwfpr tkfr o vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e] 1989 ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr Hkh funsZf'kr fd;k gS ,slk funsZ'k iw.kZr% Lohdkj ;ksX; ugh gS A

6- vr% ge bl vihy dks Loh—r djrs gS ,oa eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV }kjk ikfjr fd;s x;s vkns'k dks vikLr djrs gaS vkSj ekeys dks lh-ts-,e- fofn'kk e-iz- ds ikl u;s fljs ls fopkj.k djds fof/k vuqlkj mi;qDr vkns'k ikfjr djus gsrq okil Hkstrs gSaA

7- vihy mijksDr 'krksZ ds vUrxZr Lohd`r dh tkrh gS A

8- yafcr vkosnu] ;fn dksbZ gks] rks os Hkh fuLrkfjr gks tk,axsA

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(SC) 869

SUPREME COURT OF INDIAUDAY UMESH LALIT, INDU MALHOTRA, JJ.Ramswaroop Soni - AppellantVersusState of Madhya Pradesh & ors. - RespondentCriminal Appeal No.614 of 2009Decided on : 08-04-2019

The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the legal provision vfHk;ksx i= izLrqr to the specific case.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
UDAY UMESH LALIT, INDU MALHOTRA, JJ.
Ramswaroop Soni - Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh & ors. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.614 of 2009
Decided on : 08-04-2019