SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 942

M.R.SHAH, A.S.BOPANNA
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Junu Gayary – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant(s) Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Adv. Mr. A. K. Sharma, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR

JUDGMENT :

M.R. SHAH, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 9.6.2006 passed by the Gauhati High Court in Writ Petition (C) No. 9709/2003, by which the High Court has directed for CBI investigation with respect to the death of one Someswar Gayari alias Sombrom, as also, dismissal of review petition vide order dated 5.12.2008, the original respondents-Union of India and others have preferred the present appeals, by way of special leave petitions.

2. That the respondent herein-Smt. Junu Gayary, a young widow of deceased Someswar Gayari alias Sombrom filed a writ petition before the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for an appropriate writ, directions or order against the appellants herein-the original respondents directing them to institute a judicial enquiry into the cause and the persons responsible for the death of her husband-Someswar Gayari alias Sombrom. Further directions were also sought for compensation of rupees six lakhs to her and her family for their survival.

2.1 It was the case on behalf of the original writ petitioner that when her deceased husband was at his relative’s house at village Koilamaila under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top