R.BANUMATHI, A.S.BOPANNA
KETAN SURESH PAWAR – Appellant
Versus
YUVRAJ SANDEEPAN SAWANT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.S. BOPANNA, J.
1. The petitioners are before this Court assailing the order dated 13.02.2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Bail Application No. 191 of 2019. Through the said order the learned Judge of the High Court has directed the release of the respondent No. 1 herein subject to the conditions imposed therein. Though the petitioners were not parties to the proceedings before the High Court, being the complainants, which culminated in the registration of the F.I.R. No. 485 of 2014 registered under Sec. 420, 406, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 34 IPC on 27.11.2014 with Khar Police Station, they are in that view claiming to be aggrieved by the grant of bail.
2. Heard Shri Viraj Kadam learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri R. Basant, learned senior counsel for respondent No.1 and Shri Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar learned counsel for respondent No.2 -State and perused the petition papers.
3. The brief facts leading to the case put forth by the prosecution is that in the year 2014 one Yogesh Ahir lodged a complaint against Sunita Tupsaundarya, Ramesh Chavan, Jitendra Gadia and Yuvraj Sawant Patil. In the complaint it is alleged that the complain
Chandrakeshwar Prasad @ Chandu Babu & Anr. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.