SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 1646

A.K.SIKRI, ASHOK BHUSHAN, M.R.SHAH
Vineeta Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Biswajit Bhattacharya, Ms. Rashmi Nandakumar, AOR
For the Respondent: Mr. Subhasish Mohanty, AOR

ORDER :

1. The High Court has granted certificate of fitness to appeal under Articles 133(1)(a) and 134A of the Constitution of India having regard to the fact that there are conflicting decisions of this Court in “Prakash V. Phulavati” (2016) 2 SCC 36, “Danamma @ Suman Surpur Vs. Amar” (2018) 3 SCC 343 and “Mangammal Vs. T.B. Raju” (2018) SCC online SC 422 on the issue involved in this petition. Since the matter is to be heard by the Larger Bench i.e. three Judge Bench and this Bench is comprising of three Judges, we can hear the matter finally. Learned counsel for both the parties request some time to prepare the matter.

2. List on 05.12.2018.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top