S. Bhaskaran vs Sebastian (Dead) By Lrs.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(SC) 1017

N.V.RAMANA, MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR, AJAY RASTOGI
S. Bhaskaran – Appellant
Versus
Sebastian (Dead) By Lrs. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :Ms. Anjani Aiyagari, Advocate, Mr. Ram Lal Roy, Advocate, Mrs. M.V. Rama, Advocate, Mr. K. Ram Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent(s):Mr. S. Nanda Kumar, Advocate, Ms. Deepika Nanda Kumar, Advocate, Mr. M.S. Saran Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Palanivelu P., Advocate, Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mohan M. Shantanagoudar. J.

1. The instant appeal arises out of the order of the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 10.12.2007 in Civil Revision Petition No. 1007 of 2007, setting aside the order of the City Civil Court, Chennai dated 31.01.2007 in E.A. No. 5750/2003 in Execution Petition No. 1910/1992 in O.S. No. 8664/1988.

2. The brief facts from which this appeal arises are as follows:

The suit temple properties were originally administered by three brothers- Sadhasivamurthy, Balasundaram, and Sundararajan ('original owners'). Vide settlement deed dated 19.09.1947, these original owners endowed the property to the temple. The deed also included a provision that the eldest son of the deceased trustee would become his successor. The genealogy of the family of the original owners is as follows:

Sadhasivamurthy	Balasundaram	Sundararajan
	(issueless)	K.S.Jaganathan
Sabapathy Umapathy Ram Gnanambal
S. Bhaskaran (Appellant)

3. From 1987-88, three suits relating to the temple properties were filed. Among these, O.S. No. 8664/1988 is relevant to t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(SC) 1017

N.V.RAMANA, MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR, AJAY RASTOGIS. Bhaskaran – AppellantVersusSebastian (Dead) By Lrs. – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

N.V.RAMANA, MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR, AJAY RASTOGI
S. Bhaskaran – Appellant
Versus
Sebastian (Dead) By Lrs. – Respondent