SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1039

ARUN MISHRA, NAVIN SINHA, INDIRA BANERJEE
ITC Limited – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Kolkata IV – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the parties Mr. L. Badri Narayanan, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Matta, Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath, AOR Mr. R. Parthasarthy, Adv. Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sunita Rani Singh, Adv. Mr. B. K. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Tarun Gulati, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shashi Mathews, Adv. Mr. Ankit Sachdeva, Adv. Mr. Neil Hildreth, Adv. Mr. Vasu Nigam, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Boob, Adv. Mr. Ameya Dadhich, Adv. Mr. Kishore Kunal, Adv. Mr. S. Nanda Kumar, Adv. Mr. R. Satish Kumar, Adv. Ms. Dipika Nanda Kumar, Adv. Mr. M. S. Saran Kumar, Adv. Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. Alok Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ajay Aggarwal, Adv. Ms. Mallika Joshi, Adv. Mr. Rajan Narain, AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. R. Parthasarathy, AOR Mr. Rupesh Kumar, AOR Ms. Pankhuri Shrivastava, Adv. Mr. Pravesh Bahuguna, Adv. Ms. Vizokenuo Shuya, Adv. Ms. E. R. Sumathy, AOR Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, AOR M/S. Ap & J Chambers, AOR Mr. Rupesh Kumar, AOR M/S. Khaitan & Co., AOR Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR

JUDGMENT :

ARUN MISHRA, J.

1. These appeals have been preferred by the assessees as well as by the Union of India aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the High Courts and Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata (for short referred to as “the Tribunal”).

2. The question involved in these appeals is whether in the absence of any challenge to the order of assessment in appeal, any refund application against the assessed duty can be entertained?

3. The tribunal has in the case of ITC Limited opined that unless the order of assessment is appealed, no refund application against the assessed duty can be entertained. On the other hand, in the cases in which Union of India or the Department has come up in appeal, the High Court of Delhi framed question of law as “whether non filing of appeal against the assessed Bill of Entry in which there was no lis between the importer and the Revenue at the time of payment of duty will deprive the importer of his right to file refund claim under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short, “the 1962 Act”)”?

4. While interpreting provisions contained in Section 27 of the Act, the High Court has opined that when there is no asse

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top