Pandurang Sitaram Jadhav etc. etc. vs State Of Maharashtra Through Its Dairy Manager

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(SC) 1174

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, M.R.SHAH
Pandurang Sitaram Jadhav etc. etc. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra Through Its Dairy Manager – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Vinay Navare, Ms. Gwen Karthika, Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Mr. Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, Adv
For the Respondent: Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, Mr. Anoop Kandari, Mr. Debasis Misra, Adv

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.

1. We are faced with eleven appeals filed by eleven daily wage workers of the Regional Dairy at Konkan, Maharashtra who claim permanency of their status.

2. The appellants filed complaints before the Industrial Court, Maharashtra at Kolhapur under Section 28 read with Items 5, 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’) claiming that they had been working with the respondent for periods more than 240 days continuously over a long period of time and have not been given regular status. The status of these complainants is set out in the judgment of the Tribunal itself and would show the position qua these appellants:

Sr. No.	Complaint No.	Date of appointment	Date of completion of 240 days as per written statement
1.	951/2001	16.10.1984	11.12.1984
2.	952/2001	13.10.1983	11.12.1984
3.	953/2001	1.09.1983	18.11.1985
4.	954/2001	5.9.1986	21.9.1988
5.	957/2001	1.7.1986	29.9.1989

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(SC) 1174

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, M.R.SHAHPandurang Sitaram Jadhav etc. etc. – AppellantVersusState Of Maharashtra Through Its Dairy Manager – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, M.R.SHAH
Pandurang Sitaram Jadhav etc. etc. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra Through Its Dairy Manager – Respondent