SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1191

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
L. NAGESWARA RAO, HEMANT GUPTA, JJ.
Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. NDPL House. – Appellant(s)
Versus
Manoj Misra and Ors. Etc. Etc. – Respondent(s)
Civil Appeal Nos.9276-9290 of 2015
Decided On : 24-10-2019

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :Vikas Singh, Anupam Varma, Ankit Shah, Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, Rahul K., Nikhil Sharma, Karun Sharma, Deepina Kar, Meghna Chandra, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Prashanto Chandra Sen, P.S. Sudheer, Rishi Maheshwari, Mayuri Nayyar Chawla, Anne Mathew, Bharat Sood, Shruti Jose, Kaustubh Singh, A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG Suhasini Sen, S.S. Rebello, Shivika Aggarwal, Riya Soni, Neeleshwar Pavani, B.V. Balram Das, B. Krishna Prasad, Anup Kumar, Sanjay Parikh, Sanjana Srikumar, Srishti Agnihotri, Meera Gopal, Ritwik Parikh, Vinod Diwakar, AAG Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Ashiwan Mishra, B.N. Dubey, Kamlendra Mishra, Manoj Kumar Saxena, Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Kishor Kant Jha, Debasis Misra, Richa Kapoor, Ayushi Rajput, Pritha Srikumar Iyer, Arunima Kedia, D.N. Goburdhan, Ajay Bansal, Praveen Swarup, Gaurv Yadava, Suvesh Kumar, Veena Bansal, B.C. Santosh Kumar, Parveen Swarup, Ashwani Kumar, Reeha Verma, Ravinder Nain, Suresh Chandra Tripathy, Rohit K.Singh, M/S. Dua Associates, Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Ayushi Rajput, B.V.Balaram Das, Rachna Gupta, Pritha Srikumar, Advocates

IMPORTANT POINT
Every household should be liable for damage to environment in the area.

Headnote:

National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - Section 14 and 15 r/w section 18 (1) - Tribunal imposing environment fee on all the households - To be added in electricity bill - Upheld - Direction for imposing sewerage charges to be introduced by Government of NCT of Delhi. (Para 7, 8)

Facts of the case:

Respondent No.1 filed Original Applications under Section 14 and 15 read with Section 18 (1) of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 before the National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi. The subject matter of the application was the encroachment and dumping of building debris in the river bed/flood plain and the natural water body of river Yamuna; and ongoing encroachment and the conversion of Kushak drain into parking and road-cum-parking space, conversion of land use of the Shahdara Link Drain from ‘utility’ to ‘commercial’, and proposed construction of commercial undertaking in the form and nature of ‘Delhi Haat’, over and above the drain. The grievance of the Respondent No.1 was that the conversion of the drains has reduced the easy and efficient drainage and compromised the biodiversity present in and along the drains and their ability to recharge ground water.

The O.As. were disposed of by the Tribunal in which several directions were issued.

The Appellant which is an electricity distribution licensee filed this appeal questioning the directions issued by the Tribunal to the effect the environmental compensation has to be collected from every household by adding it to the electricity bill.

Finding of the Court:

Tribunal’s direction as regards environmental fee upheld.

Result: Appeals disposed of.

ORDER

1. Respondent No.1 filed Original Application No.6 of 2012 under Section 14 and 15 read with Section 18 (1) of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 before the National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter, ‘the Tribunal’). The subject matter of the application was the encroachment and dumping of building debris in the river bed/flood plain and the natural water body of river Yamuna. O.A. No.300 of 2013 was also filed by Respondent No.1 complaining of ongoing encroachment and the conversion of Kushak drain into parking and road-cum-parking space, conversion of land use of the Shahdara Link Drain from ‘utility’ to ‘commercial’, and proposed construction of commercial undertaking in the form and nature of ‘Delhi Haat’, over and above the drain. The grievance of the Respondent No.1 was that the conversion of the drains has reduced the easy and efficient drainage and compromised the biodiversity present in and along the drains and their ability to recharge ground water. The Tribunal divided the issues involved in the O.As. into:

a) Issues relating to the drains (natural or artificial), coverage thereof and the pollution resulting therefrom.

b) Steps required to be taken for ensuring and rendering river Yamuna free from pollution.

c) Restoration and beautification of the banks of river Yamuna.

2. Expert Committees were constituted by the Tribunal which submitted their reports on 19.04.2014 and 13.10.2014. After a careful scrutiny, the Tribunal accepted the reports of the Expert Committees.

3. The O.As. were disposed of by the Tribunal by its judgment dated 13.01.2015 in which several directions were issued. The Tribunal heard several Miscellaneous Applications that were filed in the O.A.s and issued directions for the phased implementation of the judgment dated 13.01.2015. In this appeal, we are concerned with directions 15, 16 and 17 which are as follows:

“15. The cost of the project is 3659 crores which includes establishing of new STP’s as well as providing of interceptors and sewer line in relation to the first phase only.

16. Finances for the project shall be resourced inter alia but definitely from the Ministry of Water Resources under the National Mission for Clean Ganga. DDA has nearly 281 unauthorized colonies and 10.80 lakhs residential flats in various parts of Delhi, thus, heavily contributing to the generation of the sewage. We direct Ministry of Urban Development under Urban Development fund to require DDA to release funds. Delhi Jal Board and NCT, Delhi shall finance this project primarily.

All these Ministries, Delhi Development Authority, Delhi Jal Board and other authorities of NCT, Delhi would share the liability in the proportion that may be determined by the Principle Committee under this Judgment keeping in view the total cost of first phase of the project.

We direct NCT of Delhi, Delhi Jal Board and all Municipal Corporations, Cantonment Board, electricity companies like BSES and all other civic authorities to require payment of environmental compensation from every house hold which is generating sewage in the entire NCT of Delhi on the Polluters Pay Principle. It will be irrespective of whether a house hold is sewered or not. This would be equally applicable to the house hold located in the unauthorized colonies.

17. The monthly compensation payable by all the house hold in the NCT Delhi would be directly proportionate to the property tax or water bill whichever is higher, payable by such house hold. Where the house hold or person is not paying water bill, property tax and are located in un-authorized colonies, in that event, such house hold shall pay the sum of Rs.100 or Rs. 500 per month as the case may be. This amount would be determined by the concerned authority with reference to the construction existing on the plot.

The payment of the ‘environmental compensation’ in terms of the above clauses shall be added to electricity bills, water bill and the property tax demand in order of pre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top