2018 Supreme(SC) 1649

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS)
ARUN MISHRA, NAVIN SINHA, JJ.
TARSEM LAL & ANR. – Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS. – Respondent(s)
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).4444/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-12-2017 in CRR No.3939/2016 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)
Decided On : 02-07-2018

The court's decision clarified that certain observations made in the judgment regarding the applicability of specific sections and sanction shall not be binding for future stages.

Headnote:

Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the Punjab Disturbed Areas Act, 1983 - Applicability

Fact of the Case:

The court declined to interfere with the impugned judgment/order passed by the High Court, resulting in the dismissal of the special leave petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the observations made regarding the applicability of Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the Punjab Disturbed Areas Act, 1983, and any other observation made with respect to sanction, shall not be binding for the future stages.

Issues: The applicability of Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the Punjab Disturbed Areas Act, 1983 and observations related to sanction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court decided not to interfere with the impugned judgment/order passed by the High Court and clarified that certain observations shall not be binding for future stages.

Final Decision: The special leave petition stands dismissed, and any pending application shall stand disposed of.