Back
ARUN MISHRA, NAVIN SINHA
TARSEM LAL – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent
ORDER
1. We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment/order passed by the High Court. Consequently, the special leave petition stands dismissed. Pending application, if any, shall stand disposed of.
2. However, any observation made, determining the applicability of Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the Punjab Disturbed Areas Act, 1983 and any other observation made with respect to sanction, shall not be binding for the future stages.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
