SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1765

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS)
RANJAN GOGOI, A.M. KHANWILKAR, D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ.
BIKRAM CHATTERJI & ORS. – Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent(s)
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).940/2017 WITH W.P.(C) No.1018/2017
Decided On : 22-11-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For Petitioner(s):Pawan Shree Agarwal, [A.C.] M.L. Lahoty, Paban K. Sharma, Anchit Sripat, Himanshu Shekhar, Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Ashwarya Sinha, Priyanka Sinha, Srijan Sinha, Ajit Tandon, Ameya Vikrama Thanvi, Alankrita Sinha, Mohini Priya, Girik Bhalla, Prashant Bhushan, Pavan Bhushan, Sumant Bhushan, Mukesh Kumar, Nitya Ramakrishnan, Shadan Farasat, Sarin Naved, Suhail Rashid Bhat, R. Sathish, Mohan Das, K.K., Mrs. S. Geetha, Rajesh Kumar, Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Sayaree Basu Mallik, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Alok K. Agarwal, Dhruv Gandhi, Rati Tandan, Gaurav Goel, Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Alok K. Agarwal, Dhruv Gandhi, Rati Tandan, Gaurav Goel, Rajesh Kumar, Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Gaurav Bhatia, Abhishek Singh, Utkarsh Jaiswal, Bishwajit Dubey, L. Vishwanathan, Srideepa Bhattacharyya, Aditya Marwah, for M/s. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Advs. Ashwarya Sinha, V. Giri, Sr. Vishnu Sharma, Anupama Sharma, Sonali Negi, Gautami Budhapriya, Vishnu Sharma, Anupama Sharma, Sonali Negi, Gautami Budhapriya, Vivek Tankha, Sr. Alok K. Agarwal, Dhruv Gandhi, Gaurav Goel, Subramanium Prasad, Sr. Manmeet Singh, Anjali Anchayil, Anugrah Robin Frey, Siddharth Iyer, Geetanjali Shahi, S.S. Ray, Rakhi Ray, Sanjay Bhatt, Vikas Mehta, Ravindra Kumar, Abhimanyu Bhandari, Nattasha Garg, Naveen Kumar, Advocates

The court balanced the interests of home buyers and the builder by directing a deposit, allowing possession of completed flats, and providing a refund option.

Headnote:

Deposit - Home Buyers - The court directed the respondent-builder to deposit 10% of the dues, allowed possession of flats upon granting of Occupancy Certificate and No Objection Certificate, and provided a refund option for home buyers whose flats were not yet constructed.

Fact of the Case:

Home buyers invested in flats from builders/developers and sought relief due to incomplete construction and refund issues.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the respondent-builder to deposit a percentage of dues, allowed possession of completed flats, and provided a refund option for home buyers.

Issues: Incomplete construction, refund for home buyers, possession of completed flats, and financial obligations of the builder.

Ratio Decidendi: The court balanced the interests of home buyers and the builder by directing a deposit, allowing possession of completed flats, and providing a refund option.

Final Decision: The respondent-builder was directed to deposit a percentage of dues, allowed possession of completed flats, and provided a refund option for home buyers.

ORDER

1. Diary No.37490 of 2017 is taken on Board.

2. Issue notice in W.P.(C)Nos.1144/2017 and Diary No.37490 of 2017.

3. We have heard Mr. M.L. Lahoty, learned counsel for the petitioners.

4. Mr. Pawan Shree Agarwal, Advocate is appointed in this case as Amicus Curiae.

5. Learned counsel for the home buyers submitted, they have spent their hard earned money in investing in the purchase of flats for which schemes were floated by the builders/developers – respondent nos.3 and 4. Though there is some dispute with regard to who is directly responsible, we do not intend to comment on the same at present stage. In a similar matter relating to another project we had appointed Mr. Shekhar Naphade, learned senior counsel to represent the cause of the home buyers before the Committee of Creditors constituted under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for short, 'the Code'). In the present case we also nominate Mr. Shekhar Naphade with Ms. Shubhangi Tuli to take up the cause of the home buyers before the said authority. Mr. Naphade along with Ms. Tuli is granted liberty to interact with the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to protect the interest of the home buyers.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the home buyers are in a pathetic condition and, therefore, certain amount should be directed to be deposited by the developers/builders. At this juncture, Mr. Ranjit Kumar, learned senior counsel appearing for the developer submitted that 90% flats are complete and ready for delivery in the first phase. Mr. Vishnu Sharma, learned counsel appearing for respondent-NOIDA submitted, it would not hesitate to give the Occupancy Certificate and No Objection Certificate if 15% amount is provisionally deposited with them.

7. After hearing at length, we are inclined to direct as follows :

(i) Respondent-builder shall deposit 10% of the dues of respondent no.7 before it within four weeks hence.

(ii) The phase in respect of which Occupancy Certificate and No Objection Certificate, if granted, the possession of flats shall be handed over to the respective flat owners.

(iii) The flat owners will be at liberty to complete the finishing work, if they feel so advised.

(iv) The home buyers for whom the flats are not yet been constructed and are interested in refund, can submit their applications to the portal which is to be created by Mr. Pawan Shree Agarwal.

(v) Mr. Pawan Shree Agarwal shall create the portal and inform the advocate-on-record for the respondent-developer. The advocate-on-record for the developer shall give a sum of Rs.5 lacs by way of bank draft to Shri Pawan Shree Agarwal so that he can meet the expenses. The directors, other than institutional directors, of the developer company shall remain personally present before this Court on the next date of hearing.

List the matter on Wednesday, the 17th January 2018.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top