SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1765

RANJAN GOGOI, A.M.KHANWILKAR, D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
BIKRAM CHATTERJI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Petitioner(s):Pawan Shree Agarwal, [A.C.] M.L. Lahoty, Paban K. Sharma, Anchit Sripat, Himanshu Shekhar, Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Ashwarya Sinha, Priyanka Sinha, Srijan Sinha, Ajit Tandon, Ameya Vikrama Thanvi, Alankrita Sinha, Mohini Priya, Girik Bhalla, Prashant Bhushan, Pavan Bhushan, Sumant Bhushan, Mukesh Kumar, Nitya Ramakrishnan, Shadan Farasat, Sarin Naved, Suhail Rashid Bhat, R. Sathish, Mohan Das, K.K., Mrs. S. Geetha, Rajesh Kumar, Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Sayaree Basu Mallik, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Alok K. Agarwal, Dhruv Gandhi, Rati Tandan, Gaurav Goel, Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Alok K. Agarwal, Dhruv Gandhi, Rati Tandan, Gaurav Goel, Rajesh Kumar, Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Gaurav Bhatia, Abhishek Singh, Utkarsh Jaiswal, Bishwajit Dubey, L. Vishwanathan, Srideepa Bhattacharyya, Aditya Marwah, for M/s. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Advs. Ashwarya Sinha, V. Giri, Sr. Vishnu Sharma, Anupama Sharma, Sonali Negi, Gautami Budhapriya, Vishnu Sharma, Anupama Sharma, Sonali Negi, Gautami Budhapriya, Vivek Tankha, Sr. Alok K. Agarwal, Dhruv Gandhi, Gaurav Goel, Subramanium Prasad, Sr. Manmeet Singh, Anjali Anchayil, Anugrah Robin Frey, Siddharth Iyer, Geetanjali Shahi, S.S. Ray, Rakhi Ray, Sanjay Bhatt, Vikas Mehta, Ravindra Kumar, Abhimanyu Bhandari, Nattasha Garg, Naveen Kumar, Advocates

ORDER

1. Diary No.37490 of 2017 is taken on Board.

2. Issue notice in W.P.(C)Nos.1144/2017 and Diary No.37490 of 2017.

3. We have heard Mr. M.L. Lahoty, learned counsel for the petitioners.

4. Mr. Pawan Shree Agarwal, Advocate is appointed in this case as Amicus Curiae.

5. Learned counsel for the home buyers submitted, they have spent their hard earned money in investing in the purchase of flats for which schemes were floated by the builders/developers – respondent nos.3 and 4. Though there is some dispute with regard to who is directly responsible, we do not intend to comment on the same at present stage. In a similar matter relating to another project we had appointed Mr. Shekhar Naphade, learned senior counsel to represent the cause of the home buyers before the Committee of Creditors constituted under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for short, 'the Code'). In the present case we also nominate Mr. Shekhar Naphade with Ms. Shubhangi Tuli to take up the cause of the home buyers before the said authority. Mr. Naphade along with Ms. Tuli is granted liberty to interact with the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to protect the interest of the home buyers.

6. Learned counsel fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top