SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1241

L.NAGESWARA RAO, HEMANT GUPTA
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
V. R. Nanukuttan Nair – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :Madhavi Divan, R. Balasubramanian, Sachin Sharma, Akshay Amritanshu, Arvind Kr. Sharma, B. V. Balaram Das, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Anjani Aiyagari, M.V. Rama, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

HEMANT GUPTA, J.

1. The challenge in the present appeals is to the orders passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Kochi [for short, ‘Tribunal’] on 26th October, 2010 and April 12, 2011 holding that the respondent [hereinafter referred to as the ‘applicant’] is entitled to service element of disability pension from the date of discharge.

2. The facts in brief are that the applicant was discharged on 30th June, 1978 after completion of 10 years and 169 days of service. He was in low medical category since 1970. He was granted disability pension @50% on account of suffering from Viral Myocarditis post discharge, but the applicant was denied the benefit of service element of disability pension. It is the denial of this service element which led the applicant to invoke the jurisdiction of the Tribunal.

3. The stand of the appellants before the Tribunal was that the applicant is not entitled to service element of disability pension as he was released on expiry of engagement before completion of pensionable qualifying service of 15 years and was not invalided out o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top