ASHOK BHUSHAN, NAVIN SINHA
Rani Narasimha Sastry – Appellant
Versus
Rani Suneela Rani – Respondent
What constitutes mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955? Does subjecting a husband to a trial under Section 498A IPC, resulting in acquittal, amount to cruelty by the wife?
Key Points: - Marriage solemnized on 14.08.2005; parties lived together until 17.01.2007 and separated for over 10 years [1000642990002][1000642990003]. - Appellant filed for divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) and (iii) of Hindu Marriage Act on grounds of cruelty and mental illness; trial court and High Court dismissed petition [1000642990003][1000642990004]. - Respondent filed FIR under Section 498A IPC (CC No.672/2007); appellant acquitted as prosecution failed to prove charges [1000642990005][1000642990009] (!) (!) . - Trial court rejected cruelty ground partly because 498A case was pending at time of judgment [1000642990009]. - Supreme Court held that wife's prosecution under Section 498A IPC, leading to husband's trial and acquittal, constitutes cruelty and valid ground for divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) [1000642990012][1000642990013]. - Averments and character assassination in written statement can constitute mental cruelty, citing Vijaykumar Ramchandra Bhate [1000642990010]. - Mental illness ground rejected due to insufficient evidence; respondent working as Sanskrit Lecturer [1000642990008]. - Appeal allowed; decree of divorce granted on ground of cruelty [1000642990013][1000642990015]. - Appellant directed to pay Rs.2000/- per month maintenance for minor daughter, starting December 2019 [1000642990014].
ORDER :
Leave granted.
1. Appellant appeared in-person. The respondent, despite service did not appear. This Court, vide order dated 16.09.2019, appointed Mr. Rana Mukherjee, learned senior counsel, as amicus curiae on behalf of the respondent.
2. We have heard the appellant appearing in-person as well as Mr. Rana Mukherjee, learned amicus curiae on behalf of the respondent.
3. The marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnized on 14.08.2005 at Annavaram Sri Veera Venkata Sathyanarayana Swamy Temple of East Godavari District of Andhra Pradesh. After marriage appellant and respondent lived together until 17.01.2007 and thereafter they have been living separately for more than 10 years.
4. This appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh dated 05.01.2017 in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.1279/2011. The appellant has filed O.P. No.109/2007 in the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, R.R. District, L.B. Nagar under Section 13(1)(i-a) and (iii) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") praying for dissolution of the marriag
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.