SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1338

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, HRISHIKESH ROY
Malarvizhi – Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance Company Limited – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :Jayanth Muth Raj, C.K.Sasi, Nayantara Roy, Malavika Jayanth, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Ravi Bakshi, Chander Shekhar Ashri, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J.

1. The present appeals arise from a judgment of a Division Bench of the Madras High Court dated 20 July 2018 in a first appeal and cross-objection from the decision of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal [Tribunal], Ranipet.

2. The appellants are the heirs and legal representatives of Aranganathan who died as a result of a motor accident on 25 May 2001. He was travelling in an Ambassador car bearing Registration No TN 23 A 7549 which was being driven by another person. At about 12:45 am, a Tata Sierra car bearing Registration No TN 20 Z 1613 came from the opposite direction and dashed against the car of the deceased. Aranganathan was seriously injured and died during the course of the accident. He is survived by his wife and four daughters who are the appellants before this Court.

3. The appellants filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the Tribunal, seeking compensation in the amount of Rs 99,90,000. By its award dated 11 July 2012, the Tribunal allowed the claim in the amount of Rs 59,04,000 together


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top