R.F.NARIMAN, S.RAVINDRA BHAT
Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.
1. Leave granted. With consent, all counsel who appeared were heard.
2. The appellant (hereafter “Daffodills”), a pharmaceutical supplier, is aggrieved by a decision of the Allahabad High Court, rejecting its challenge to an order (dated 21.08.2015) issued by the Principal Secretary, Government of U.P. to its Medical and Health Department, directing it to stop local purchase from the appellant. Daffodills had participated in a tender process, in which the state called for bids from interested parties, willing to supply various categories of pharmaceutical products. The successful bidder was required to supply medicines to various hospitals, under the control of the Medical and Health Department, U.P. for one year. Daffodills was one amongst 56 bidders; its bid was acceptable to the respondent, i.e. State of U.P.
3. Daffodills was asked to match its previous bid to the Tamil Nadu Service Corporation Ltd. for the year 2015-16, at approved L1 rates, on or before, 29.05.2015 in respect of 14 specified drugs. At the time of bid submission, every tenderer/bidder had to furnish a declaration to the following effect:
“Firms should give an affidavit that there is
Rastriya Ispat Nigam v. Verma (2006) 7 SCC 275 – Referred [Para 8]
Kalja Industries v. Western Telecom (2014) 14 SCC 731) – Referred [Para 8]
Erusian Equipments and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of West Bengal
Raghunath Thakur v. State of Bihar & Ors.
Southern Painters v. Fertilizers & Chemicals Travancore Ltd.
Grosons Pharmaceuticals (P) Ltd. v. State of U.P.
B.S.N. Joshi & Sons Ltd. v. Nair Coal Services Ltd. (2006) 11 SCC 548 – Relied [Para 14]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.