UDAY UMESH LALIT, INDU MALHOTRA
PAWAN HANS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
AVIATION KARMACHARI SANGHATANA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
INDU MALHOTRA, J.
Leave granted.
1. The issue which arises for consideration is whether the contractual employees of the AppellantCompany are entitled to provident fund benefits under the Pawan Hans Employees Provident Fund Trust Regulations or under the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (“EPF Act”) and the Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme, 1952 (“EPF Scheme”) framed thereunder.
2. The background facts in which the present Civil Appeal has been filed are as under :
2.1 The Company was incorporated on 15.10.1985 under the Companies Act, 1956, and is registered as a Government of India company with the Registrar of Companies, Delhi. The Government of India holds 51% shareholding in the AppellantCompany and the remaining 49% is held by Oil and Natural Gas Company Ltd. (ONGC).
The Company was incorporated with the primary objective of providing helicopter support services to the oil sector for its offshore exploration operations, services in remote and hilly areas, and charter services for promotion of tourism. It is classified as a nonscheduled operator under Rule 134 of the Aircraft Rules, 1937.
2.2 On 01.04.1986, the AppellantCompany framed and
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Sanatan Dharam Girls Secondary School
Shamrao Vithal Coop. Bank Ltd. v. Kasargode Panduranga Maliya
Sub-Regional Provident Fund Office v. Godavari Garments Ltd.
M/s P.M. Patel & Sons and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors (1986) 1 SCC 32 – Relied [Para 6.5]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.