SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 120

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AJAY RASTOGI
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Krishan Gopal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Dr. Lalit Bhasin, Adv. Ms. Nina Gupta, Adv. Ms. Palak Chadha, Adv. Ms. Ruchika Joshi, Adv. Mr. Mudit Sharma, AOR Mr. S. Guru Krishna Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. V.N. Subramaniam, Adv. Ms. Shruta Gopalan, Adv. Ms. Madhusmita Bora, AOR Mr. V.N. Koura, Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv. Mr. Shirish Kumar, Adv. Ms. Paramjeet Benipal, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Arputham, Adv. For M/S. Arputham Aruna And Co Mr. Abhishek Puri, Adv. Mr. V. Siddharth, Adv. Mr. P. N. Puri, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Ms. Asha Jain Madan, AOR Mr. Mukesh Jain, AOR Ms. Alka Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. R.R. Rajesh, Adv. Mr. Raj Bahadur, Adv. Mr. S. Guru Krishna Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. V.N. Subramanian, Adv. Ms. Shruta Gopalan, Adv. Mr. Anzu. K. Varkey, AOR Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, AOR Ms. Suchitra Hrangkhawl, Adv. Mr. Ganesan Subbian, Adv. Mr. Parnam Prabhakar, Adv. Mr. Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, AOR Mr. Santosh Krishnan, AOR Mr. V.N. Koura, Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv. Mr. Shirish Kumar, Adv. Ms. Paramjeet Benipal, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Arputham, Adv. For M/S. Arputham Aruna And Co Mr. Ayush Negi, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, AOR Mr. P. Venkat Reddy, Adv. Mr. Prashant Tyagi, Adv. Mr. P. Srinivas Reddy, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.

1. This batch of appeals arises from the judgments of the High Courts of Andhra Pradesh, Delhi, Madras and Uttarakhand. A judgment of a two judge Bench of this Court in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited v Petroleum Coal Labour Union, (2015) 6 SCC 494 (“PCLU”) has assumed focus since the decisions of the High Courts in four of the present appeals have relied on the judgment of this Court in coming to the conclusion that the workmen were entitled to regularisation in service. In one of the five appeals, however where the prayer for regularisation was rejected, the decision in PCLU has been distinguished. Hence on either end of the spectrum, the judgment in PCLU has a significant bearing on the outcome of the appeals.

2. The manner in which the present appeals arise is indicated, for convenience of reference, in the following tabulation:

Sl. Nos.

Particulars

Remarks

1

Civil Appeals @ SLP (C) Nos. 15971-15998/2018 ONGC & Ors. v ONGC Field Operators Union & Ors.

The appeals arise out of a judgment dated 5 January


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top