D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AJAY RASTOGI
K. Sivaraman – Appellant
Versus
P. Sathishkumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J
1. This appeal arises from a judgment of a Division Bench of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dated 1 June 2017. In an appeal arising from a decision of the Deputy Commissioner for Employee‘s Compensation, the High Court enhanced the compensation payable under the Employee‘s Compensation Act 1923 [1923 Act] from Rs 4,33,060 to Rs 8,86,120. The High Court has awarded interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the accident.
2. In the present proceedings which have been instituted under Article 136 of the Constitution, notice was issued on 26 July 2019. Since the appellants were represented by the first appellant in person, this Court, by its order dated 26 July 2019, directed that an amicus curiae be nominated by the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee. Accordingly, Mr S. Mahendran, learned counsel, has been nominated as the amicus curiae, whom we have heard in support of the appeal.
3. The appellants are the father, mother, sister and brother of Dinesh Kumar, who died in the course of an accident on 31 January 2008. On
Pratap Narain Singh Deo v Srinivas Sabata
Kerala State Electricity Board v Valsala K
New India Assurance Company Ltd. v Neelakandan (“Neelakandan”)
Oriental Insurance Company v Siby George
Commissioner of Income Tax v Vatika Township Private Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.