SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 149

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AJAY RASTOGI
K. Sivaraman – Appellant
Versus
P. Sathishkumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant(s) :S. Mahendran, Advocate (A.C.)

JUDGMENT :

Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J

1. This appeal arises from a judgment of a Division Bench of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dated 1 June 2017. In an appeal arising from a decision of the Deputy Commissioner for Employee‘s Compensation, the High Court enhanced the compensation payable under the Employee‘s Compensation Act 1923 [1923 Act] from Rs 4,33,060 to Rs 8,86,120. The High Court has awarded interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the accident.

2. In the present proceedings which have been instituted under Article 136 of the Constitution, notice was issued on 26 July 2019. Since the appellants were represented by the first appellant in person, this Court, by its order dated 26 July 2019, directed that an amicus curiae be nominated by the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee. Accordingly, Mr S. Mahendran, learned counsel, has been nominated as the amicus curiae, whom we have heard in support of the appeal.

3. The appellants are the father, mother, sister and brother of Dinesh Kumar, who died in the course of an accident on 31 January 2008. On


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top