This petition is maintainable as it pertains to the exercise of jurisdiction by the Family Court under the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, specifically Section 125 Cr.P.C., which provides a statutory remedy for maintenance claims. The Family Court has the authority to modify, set aside, or revive maintenance orders based on the circumstances of the case, including non-compliance with settlement terms or changing conditions of the parties (!) (!) .

Furthermore, the order passed by the Family Court to set aside and restore the maintenance petition falls within its jurisdiction to ensure justice and fairness, especially when the original terms of settlement have not been honored. The High Court’s decision to dismiss the challenge under Section 482 Cr.P.C. indicates that the petition was properly filed within the scope of the law and that the Family Court’s actions were within its legal powers (!) .

Additionally, the procedural aspects, such as notice and opportunity to be heard, appear to have been observed, which further supports the petition’s maintainability. The legal framework recognizes that maintenance orders are not final in perpetuity and can be revisited when justified, making such petitions valid and appropriate in the circumstances described (!) (!) .

In summary, given the statutory provisions, the jurisdictional scope of the Family Court, and the procedural safeguards, this petition is maintainable as a legitimate legal remedy to address the ongoing support obligations and to uphold the rights of the aggrieved party.