2020 Supreme(SC) 203
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
N.V. RAMANA, ARUN MISHRA, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, R. BANUMATHI, ASHOK BHUSHAN, JJ.
PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA – PETITIONER
Versus
THE STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI – RESPONDENT
CURATIVE PETITION (CRIMINAL)………..D.No. 8243 OF 2020 IN
REVIEW PETITION(CRIMINAL )No. 671 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No .608 OF 2017
Decided On : 02-03-2020
The court's decision was influenced by the parameters indicated in the decision of the Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Another, reported in 2002 (4) SCC 388, which served as the basis for the dismissal of the Curative Petition.
Headnote:
Curative Petition - Rejection of Oral Hearing and Stay of Execution - Dismissal of Curative Petition
Fact of the Case:
The court rejected the application for oral hearing and stay of execution of death sentence. After reviewing the Curative Petition and relevant documents, the court found that no case was made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of the Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Another, reported in 2002 (4) SCC 388. Consequently, the Curative Petition was dismissed, and the pending interlocutory application was disposed of.
Finding of the Court:
The court rejected the application for oral hearing and stay of execution of death sentence, and dismissed the Curative Petition after reviewing the relevant documents.
Issues: Application for oral hearing, Stay of execution of death sentence, Dismissal of Curative Petition
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that no case was made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of the Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Another, reported in 2002 (4) SCC 388, leading to the dismissal of the Curative Petition.
Final Decision: The application for oral hearing and stay of execution of death sentence was rejected, and the Curative Petition was dismissed. The pending interlocutory application was also disposed of.
ORDER
1. The application for oral hearing is rejected.
2. The application for stay of execution of death sentence is also rejected.
3. We have gone through the Curative Petition and the relevant documents. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Another, reported in 2002 (4) SCC 388. Hence, the Curative Petition is dismissed.
4. As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of.