D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AJAY RASTOGI
Joint Labour Commissioner and Registering Officer – Appellant
Versus
Kesar Lal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, J.
1. The neat issue which has to be adjudicated upon in this appeal is whether a construction worker who is registered under the Building and Other Construction Workers’ (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996(Act of 1996) and is a beneficiary of the Scheme made under the Rules framed pursuant to the enactment, is a ‘consumer’ within the meaning of Section 2(d) of the Consumer Protection Act 1986. The issue assumes significance because the answer will determine whether a beneficiary of a statutory welfare scheme is entitled to exact accountability by invoking the remedies under the Consumer Protection Act 1986.
2. Parliament enacted the Act of 1996 “to regulate the employment and conditions of service of building and other construction workers and to provide for their safety, health and welfare measures and for other matters connected therewith or with incidental thereto”. In pursuance of the rule-making powers conferred by Sections 40 and 62, the Union Government has framed the Building and Other Construction Workers’ (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1998. The State of Rajasthan has also framed th
Bihar School Examination Board v. Suresh Prasad Sinha
Regional Provident Commissioner v. Shiv Kumar Joshi
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Bhawani
Canara Bank v. United India Insurance Company Limited
Lucknow Development Authority v. M.K. Gupta
Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (now GLADA) v. Vidya Chetal
National Campaign Committee for the Central Legislation on Construction Labour v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.