UDAY UMESH LALIT, VINEET SARAN
Dinesh Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Judicature of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Uday Umes h Lalit, J.
1. These Writ Petitions broadly fall in following three categories:-
A] Writ Petition (Civil) No. 936 of 2018 filed by four petitioners, prays for appropriate directions that after the promulgation of Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 2010 (“2010 Rules”, for short), all appointments ought to be in conformity with 2010 Rules and allocation of seniority must be in accordance with the Cyclic Order provided in Schedule VII to 2010 Rules. In terms of 2010 Rules, posts in the cadre of District Judges in the Higher Judicial Service in State of Rajasthan were required to be filled up in accordance with quota of 50% for Promotees, 25% for Direct Recruits and 25% by way of Limited Competitive Examination (“LCE”, for short) in keeping with law laid down by this Court in All India Judges Association vs. Union of India and Others, (2002) 4 SCC 247. This Writ Petition filed by candidates who were successful in LCE prays that they be allocated seniority in terms of the Cyclic Order in Schedule VII. In this group fall Writ Petition (Civil) No.498 of 2018 and Writ P
All India Judges’ Association v. Union of India and others
Brij Mohan Lal v. Union of India and others
Malik Mazhar Sultan v. U.P. Public Service Commission
All India Judges’ Association v. Union of India
Rajasthan Judicial Service Officers’ Association v. State of Rajasthan
Debabrata Dash v. Jatindra Prasad Das
V. Venkata Prasad v. High Court of A.P.
Kum C. Yamini v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Union of India v. N. R. Parmar
State of M.P. v. Narmada Bachao Andolan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.