SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 352

UDAY UMESH LALIT, VINEET SARAN
Pilcom – Appellant
Versus
C. I. T. West Bengal-VII – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :Satish Kumar, M/S. Fox Mandal & Co., Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Zoheb Hussain, Anil Katiyar, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

UDAY UMESH LALIT, J.

Civil Appeal No.5749 OF 2012

1. This appeal by special leave challenges the Judgment and Order dated 11.11.2010 passed by the High Court(The High Court of Judicature at Calcuttta) dismissing Income Tax Appeal No.196 of 2000 and thereby affirming the view taken by the Tribunal(Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Calcutta) in I.T.A. Nos. 110/Cal/1999 and 402/Cal/1999 on 04.01.2000.

2. The facts leading to the filing of the proceedings before the Tribunal were set out in the Order dated 04.01.2000 as under:-

    “2. The assesse before us is PAK-INDO-LANKA, JOINT MANAGEMENT COMMITTTEE (known in short as PILCOM) which is actually a Committee formed by the Cricket Control Boards/Associations of three countries viz. Pakistan, India and Sri Lanka, for the purpose of conducting the World Cup Cricket tournament for the year 1996 in these three countries. Actually, International Cricket Council (ICC) is a non-profit making organization having its Headquarters at London, which controls and conducts the game of cricket in the different countries of the world. ICC has got ni


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top