SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ARUN MISHRA, INDIRA BANERJEE, VINEET SARAN, M.R. SHAH, ANIRUDDHA BOSE, JJ.
PANDURANG GANPATI CHAUGULE– APPELLANT
VERSUS
VISHWASRAO PATIL MURGUD SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED – RESPONDENT
Civil Appeal No. 5674, 5684, 5682, 5681 & 5675 of 2009; Civil Appeal No. 10871 of 2010; Civil Appeal No. 2384 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 25930 of 2009); Civil Appeal No. 4391 of 2010; Civil Appeal No. 2385 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 24309 of 2010); Civil Appeal No. 7410 of 2010; Civil Appeal No. 2386 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 29859 of 2010); Writ Petition (Civil) No. 318 of 2010; Civil Appeal Nos. 2387-90 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 7295-7298 of 2011); Writ Petition (Civil) No. 41 of 2011; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 220 of 2011writ Petition (Civil) No. 293 of 2011; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 306 of 2011; Civil Appeal Nos. 2391-92 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 22304-22305 of 2011); Writ Petition (Civil) No. 338 of 2011; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 375 of 2011; Civil Appeal Nos. 2393-94 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 24479-24480 of 2011); Writ Petition (Civil) No. 122 of 2012; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 199 of 2012; Civil Appeal No. 2395 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 24276 of 2012); Writ Petition (Civil) No. 250 of 2012; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 291 of 2012; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 386 of 2012; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 487 of 2012; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 537 of 2012; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 554 of 2012; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 36 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 146 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 138 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 179 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 192 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 191 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 112 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 111 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 151 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 175 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 181 of 2013civil Appeal Nos. 2396-97 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 15634-15635 of 2013); Civil Appeal No. 2398 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 12916 of 2013); Writ Petition (Civil) No. 201 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 233 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 236 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 238 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 253 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 250 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 248 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 271 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 265 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 270 of 2013; Civil Appeal No. 2399 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 17054 of 2013); Civil Appeal No. 2400 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 18777 of 2013); Civil Appeal No. 2401 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 18775 of 2013); Writ Petition (Civil) No. 279 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 266 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 280 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 284 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 353 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 469 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 452 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 588 of 2013; Civil Appeal No. 2402 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 29720 of 2013)Civil Appeal No. 2403 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 29721 of 2013); Writ Petition (Civil) No. 758 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 762 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 761 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 800 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 753 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 819 of 2013; Civil Appeal No. 2404 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 35137 of 2013); Writ Petition (Civil) No. 922 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1007 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 5 of 2014; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 10 of 2014; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1037 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1044 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1043 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1045 of 2013; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 40 of 2014; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 142 of 2014; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 169 of 2014; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 168 of 2014; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 352 of 2014; Civil Appeal No. 2405 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 17935 of 2015); Civil Appeal No................of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No............of 2020) (@ Cc No. 7586 of 2014); Writ Petition (Civil) No. 408 of 2014writ Petition (Civil) No. 420 of 2014; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 421 of 2014; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 492 of 2014; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 712 of 2014; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 714 of 2014; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 795 of 2014; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 754 of 2014; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 827 of 2014; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 849 of 2014; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 838 of 2014; Civil Appeal No. 2406 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 32589 of 2014); Writ Petition (Civil) No. 26 of 2015; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1020 of 2014; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 86 of 2015; Civil Appeal No. 2407 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 7694 of 2015); Writ Petition (Civil) No. 186 of 2015; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 733 of 2015; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 131 of 2015; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 264 of 2015; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 247 of 2016; Civil Appeal No. 2408 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 27645 of 2015); Writ Petition (Civil) No. 868 of 2015; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 858 of 2015; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 14 of 2018; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 68 of 2018; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1062 of 2018writ Petition (Civil) No. 1173 of 2018; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1231 of 2018; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1437 of 2018; Civil Appeal No. 2409 of 2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 1877 of 2019); Civil Appeal No. 6662 of 2019; Civil Appeal No. 1980-1983 of 2019; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 253 of 2019; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 254 of 2019; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 439 of 2019; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 431 of 2019; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 567 of 2019; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 736 of 2019; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 752 of 2019; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 910 of 2019; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1027 of 2019; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1043 of 2019; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1035 of 2019; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1232 of 2019; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1355 of 2019; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1331 of 2019; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1339 of 2019; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1353 of 2019; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 31 of 2020; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 62 of 2020; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 72 of 2020; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 134 of 2020; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 207 of 2020writ Petition (Civil) No. 271 of 2020; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 289 of 2020; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 292 of 2020; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 373 of 2020.
Decided on : 05-05-2020
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of conflicting decisions about cooperative banks. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments regarding the legislative scope of banking laws. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. court's analysis on the legislative entries and banking definitions. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. key ratios regarding the applicability of banking regulations. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 5. final conclusions on the legislative competence regarding cooperative banks. (Para 94 , 102) |
JUDGMENT
Arun Mishra, J.
The matters have been referred in view of conflicting decisions in Greater Bombay Coop. Bank Ltd. v. United Yarn Tex (P) Ltd. and Ors., (2007) 6 SCC 236, Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors., (1983) 4 SCC 166, T. Velayudhan Achari and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors., (1993) 2 SCC 582, and Union of India and Anr. v. Delhi High Court Bar Association and Ors., (2002) 4 SCC 275. The question relates to the scope of the legislative field covered by Entry 45 of List I viz. 'Banking' and Entry 32 of List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India, consequentially power of the Parliament to legislate. The moot question is the applicability of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, 'the SARFAESI Act') to the co-operative banks.
1. The Parliament's competence to amend Section 2 (c) of the SARFAESI Act by adding sub-clause '(iva) - a multi-State co-operative bank' has also been questioned. The issue arises whether the definition of 'banking company' contained in Section 5(c) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (for short, 'the BR Act, 1949') covers Co-operative banks registered under the State law and also multi-State co-operative societies under the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 (for short, 'the MSCS Act'). Consequently, (i) whether Co-operative banks at State and multi-State level are co-operative banks within the purview of the SARFAESI Act ? and (ii) whether provisions of the SARFAESI Act apply to the co-operative banks registered under the MSCS Act ?
2. Section 56 (c)(i)(cci) is contained in Part V of the BR Act, 1949, and was brought into force on 1.3.1966. It defines 'co-operative bank' to mean a 'state co-operative bank,' a 'central co-operative bank,' and a 'primary co-operative bank.' By the notification issued in 2003, the co-operative bank was brought within the class of banks entitled to seek recourse to the provisions of the SARFAESI Act. Section 2 (1)(c) (iva) was inserted into the SARFAESI Act, w.e.f. 15.1.2013. Before that, the co-operative bank and the multi-State co-operative bank took recourse to the SARFAESI Act under the notification issued in 2003.
3. Writ petitions were filed questioning vires of the notification dated 28.1.2003 issued under Section 2 (1)(c)(v) of the SARFAESI Act and the insertion of Section 2 (1)(c)(iva) to the SARFAESI Act in 2013. The backdrop history of litigation indicates that in Narendra Kantilal Shah v. Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, AIR 2004 Bom 166 a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court opined that term 'banking company' also means co-operative bank within the meaning of Section 2 (d) of the RDB Act, 1993. Hence, with effect from the date of constitution of Debts Recovery Tribunal under RDB Act, 1993, the courts and authorities under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, as also the MSCS Act would cease to have jurisdiction to entertain the applications submitted by the co-operative banks for recovery of their dues. The decision in Narendra Kantilal Shah (supra) was set aside by this Court in Greater Bombay Coop. Bank Ltd. (supra). This Court opined that the co-operative banks established under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and Andhra Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.