A. M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI
Kapilaben Ambalal Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
The judgment has been cited further in subsequent legal proceedings and discussions related to the same or similar issues of land acquisition, possession, and procedural delays. It has been referenced to support arguments concerning the importance of timely filing of legal challenges, the validity of possession and notification procedures, and the principles of laches and delay in filing writ petitions. The case has also been used to emphasize the significance of actual physical possession over mere paper possession, and the impact of procedural lapses on the enforceability of land acquisition actions. These references indicate that the judgment continues to be relevant in ongoing legal debates about the procedural correctness and timeliness of land acquisition and related rights.
JUDGMENT
A.M. Khanwilkar, J.
1. This appeal takes exception to the judgment and order dated 26.4.2011 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad [For short, “the High Court”] in Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) No. 233/2006, whereby, the writ petition being Special Civil Application No. 12602/2001 filed by the appellants came to be dismissed whilst setting aside the judgment and order dated 21.12.2005 passed by the learned single Judge of the High Court in the said writ petition. By the said writ petition, the appellants had sought following reliefs:
“8. The petitioners pray that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction and/or order and be pleased:
(A) to declare that the Panchnama dated 20.03.1986, (Annexure D) and the purported action of the respondents to take possession, purported constructive or actual of the lands mentioned in para (c) hereinabove is contrary to law and of no legal effect.
(B) to permanently restrain the respondents from disturbing or taking
Special Officer & Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceilings, Hyderabad & Anr. vs. P.S. Rao
Larsen & Toubro Ltd. vs. State of Gujarat & Ors.
State of Gujarat & Anr. vs. Gyanaba Dilavarsinh Jadega
Madhusudan Bhanuprasad Pandya vs. State of Gujarat & Ors.
Balwant Narayan Bhagde vs. M.D. Bhagwat & Ors.
Balmokand Khatri Educational and Industrial Trust vs. State of Punjab
Tamil Nadu Housing Board vs. A. Viswam (Dead) by LRs.
Vinayak Kashinath Shilkar vs. Deputy Collector and Competent Authority & Ors.
State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Hari Ram
Gajanan Kamlya Patil vs. Additional Collector and Competent Authority (ULC) & Ors.
Mangalsen vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Samrathben Manilal Chokshi & Anr. vs. State of Gujarat & Anr.
Savitaben Ramanbhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat & Ors.
Darothi Clare Parreira (Smt.) & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
South India Corporation (P) Ltd. vs. Secretary, Board of Trivandrum & Anr.
Ramanlal Bhailal Patel & Ors. vs. State of Gujarat
Har Pyari (Smt.) vs. IInd Additional Judge, Moradabad & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.