Back
A.M.KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI
Bangalore Mysore Infrastructure Corridor Area Planning Authority – Appellant
Versus
Nandi Infrastructure Corridor Enterprise Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the litigation background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. court's reasoning on jurisdiction and compliance with agreements. (Para 15 , 17 , 25 , 26 , 31 , 36 , 38 , 41 , 42 , 46 , 60) |
| 3. interpretation of the governing documents and obligations. (Para 18 , 19 , 24 , 34 , 51 , 52 , 56 , 68) |
| 4. arguments regarding authority and appropriateness of approvals. (Para 22 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 33) |
| 5. final conclusion on the obligations of the project proponents. (Para 63 , 69) |
A.M. Khanwilkar, J.
2. This is the fifth round of litigation pertaining to the Integrated Infrastructure Corridor and Finance Project [For short, "the IICFP" or "the Project"] situated between Bangalore and Mysore, Karnataka, consisting of residential, industrial and commercial facilities, such as, among other things, self-sustaining Townships, expressways, utilities and amenities including power plants, industrial plants, water treatment plants and other infrastructural developments, as more specifically described in the Infrastructure Corridor Project Technical Report [For short, "
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
