SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, K.M.JOSEPH
SONU @ SUNIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K.M. Joseph, J.
The appellant was tried with 4 others and was convicted under Sections 394, 460 and 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as, 'the IPC' , for short) . He was also found guilty of offences under Sections 11 and 13 of the Madhya Pradesh Dakaiti Avam Vyapharan Adhiniyam, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as, ^Madhya Pradesh Adhiniyam'). The appellant was, in fact, sentenced to death for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC along with two other accused apart from a fine of Rs. 5000/-. He was sentenced to 10 years Rigorous Imprisonment in regard to the offence under Section 460 of the IPC. He was also handed down a sentence of 10 years for the offence under Section 394 read with Section 34 of the IPC. Still further, he was also sentenced to 7 years for the offence under Sections 11 and 13 of the Madhya Pradesh Adhiniyam. By the impugned judgment, the High Court answered the death reference by holding that in the circumstances, the death penalty was not warranted. In place of death penalty, the High Court sentenced the appellant and two other accused to life imprisonment and enhanced the fine to Rs. 25
Ashish Jain vs. Makrand Singh and others
Sunder Lal alias Sundera vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Sanwant Khan and another vs. State of Rajasthan
Baiju vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Shri Bhagwan vs. State of Rajasthan
Hardev Singh and others vs. State of Punjab
Arun vs. State by Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu
Arun vs. State by Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.