SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1428

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
UDAY UMESH LALIT, INDU MALHOTRA, JJ
Ms. Catherine Anderson – Appellant
Versus
Ashwani Bhatia - Respondent
Petition For Arbitration (Civil) No.35 of 2018
Decided on : 05-04-2019.

The court's decision was influenced by the arbitration clause in the partnership deeds and the provisions of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

Headnote:

Arbitration - International Commercial Arbitration - Appointment of Sole Arbitrator

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, an Australian citizen, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 for the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from two partnership deeds.

Finding of the Court:

The court appointed Justice Surinder Thakur (Retd.) as the Sole Arbitrator, subject to the declaration of independence and impartiality, and directed that the arbitration be conducted at Shimla as the seat/place of arbitration.

Issues: Appointment of Sole Arbitrator, Seat/Place of Arbitration

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the arbitration clause in the partnership deeds and the provisions of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint the Sole Arbitrator and determine the seat/place of arbitration.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the matter by appointing the Sole Arbitrator and specifying the seat/place of arbitration.

ORDER :

INDU MALHOTRA, J.

1. The Petitioner has filed an Application under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 in an international commercial arbitration, since the Petitioner is an Australian citizen.

2. Both parties have requested for the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes which have arisen between them emanating from the Partnership Deed dated 10.04.2000 of M/s. Moonpeak Pictures, and Partnership Deed dated 23.03.2005 of M/s Moonpeak Espresso.

3. Both the Partnership Agreements are between the same parties, and have an identical arbitration clause, which reads as under :

    “11. That all the disputes and questions in connection with this partnership or this deed and whether during or after the partnership shall be referred to arbitration for which the arbitrator(s) will be appointed with mutual consent of both the partners and that the decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon both the partners, hereto this deed.”

4. We appoint Justice Surinder Thakur (Retd.) Judge of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla as the Sole Arbitrator, subject to the declaration being made under Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with respect to independence and impartiality, and the ability to devote sufficient time to complete the arbitration within the period of 12 months. Upon acceptance, the parties will pay fees to the Arbitrator in accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as amended.

5. The arbitration agreement does not specify the seat/place of arbitration. We direct that the arbitration be conducted at Shimla, as the Seat/Place of arbitration.

6. A copy of this Order be despatched to Justice Surinder Thakur (Retd.) at the following address:

    “Justice Surender Singh Thakur

    627, Amit apartments,

    The Mall, Solan.

    Mob : 09418900061 ”

The matter is disposed of accordingly.

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top