Sanjeev Kumar Etc vs State of UP - 2017 Supreme(SC) 1766

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2017 Supreme(SC) 1766

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, UDAY UMESH LALIT
Sanjeev Kumar Etc – Appellant
Versus
State of UP – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, Adv. Mr. Puran Mal Saini, Adv. Ms. Anzu K.Varkey, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Ajay Kumar Misra, Sr. Adv. Ms. Tulika Mukherjee, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Mishra, Adv. Mr. Srivandit Misra, Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, Adv.

ORDER :

1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties at length.

2. We are in agreement with the view taken in the impugned judgment. The judgment of the High Court is accordingly affirmed.

3. The civil appeals are accordingly dismissed. No costs.

4. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2017 Supreme(SC) 1766

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, UDAY UMESH LALITSanjeev Kumar Etc – AppellantVersusState of UP – Respondent

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, UDAY UMESH LALIT
Sanjeev Kumar Etc – Appellant
Versus
State of UP – Respondent