SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 1732

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
Mahin – Appellant
Versus
Keezhmad Grama Panchayat – Respondent
W.P.(C) No.18136 of 2017
Decided on : 05-11-2018

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Biju Martin, D.M. Nowfal, M.M. Salim & T.B. Gafoor
For the Respondent: S. Shanavas Khan

A local authority cannot deny an occupancy certificate based on land classification (e.g., wetland) after granting a building permit, if the land is no longer cultivable. Structural deviations from the permit may be regularized through a revised plan and permit renewal.

Headnote:(A) Panchayat Raj Act and Rules - Building permit and occupancy certificate - Denial of building number and occupancy certificate on grounds of deviation from sanctioned plan and land classification as ‘Nilam’ - Once a building permit is granted and construction is carried out, the authority cannot subsequently object to the nature of the land, particularly when the land is no longer fit for cultivation - Regularization of deviations in construction requires submission of a revised plan and renewal of building permit if necessary.

Facts of the case:
The petitioners obtained a building permit in 2010 for two residential units on their land. While the construction of the first unit was completed and assigned a building number, the application for the second unit's occupancy certificate and building number was rejected. The rejection was based on the construction deviating from the permitted plinth area and number of floors, and the land being recorded as ‘Nilam’ in revenue records. The petitioners sought regularization through a revised plan.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the objection regarding the nature of the land could not be raised at this stage, as the permit had been previously granted and the land was no longer usable for the cultivation of paddy or other food crops.

Issues: Whether the local authority can reject an occupancy certificate based on the land's revenue classification after previously granting a building permit, and whether structural deviations from a permitted plan can be regularized.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the authority is estopped from raising objections regarding the nature of the land after granting a building permit, especially when agricultural utility is lost. However, for construction that violates the terms of the building permit, the petitioners must submit a revised plan and apply for a renewal of the building permit for consideration by the authority.

Result: Writ Petition disposed of with directions to the petitioners to submit a renewal application and revised plan, and the respondent to consider the same without reference to the nature of the land.

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • administrative law
    • local government
      • building regulation
        • building permits
        • occupancy certificates
  • real property law
    • land classification
      • agricultural land (nilam)
  • practice and procedure
    • writ jurisdiction

JUDGMENT :

The petitioners, who are husband and wife, are stated to be in ownership and possession of a total extent of 20.500 cents of land in Sy.No.27/11-5 of Aluva East village. With a view to constructing two residential buildings on the said land, the petitioners applied for and obtained a building permit in the year 2010 for construction of two units, referred to here as Unit -- A and Unit -- B respectively. It is stated that the construction of Unit -A was completed, and the respondent Panchayat allotted a building number to the said unit as well. As regards Unit -- B, after completion of construction, when the petitioners preferred an application for occupancy certificate and allotment of a building number, the same was rejected by the respondent Panchayat by Ext.P6 order, which cites two reasons for the rejection of the application, namely, (1) that the building permit was granted for constructing a building of plinth area of 80.12 sq.metres with one floor, whereas the construction put up by the petitioners was of a two storied building with a total plinth area of 133.84 sq.metres. (2) The land on which the construction was put up was shown as ‘Nilam’ in the revenue records. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that, inasmuch as the construction was permitted by the respondent Panchayat by granting a building permit, and thereafter, granting a building number to Unit – A that was put up by the petitioners acting on the building permit, the Panchayat could not object to the nature of the land at this distance of time. As regards the other objection with regard to the construction being in violation of the building permit, it is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners that a revised building plan can be submitted before the respondent Panchayat for its consideration in the matter of regularisation of the construction of Unit -- B. The learned counsel for the respondent Panchayat would submit that, the building permit originally granted to the petitioners was in 2010, and two renewals have already been granted to the said building permit, and if the petitioners want to now submit a revised plan for consideration of the Panchayat, then they would also have to make an application for renewal of the building permit for the last term in order to support the application for consideration of the revised building plan. Taking note of the rival submissions, and finding that the issue as regards the nature of the land on which the construction was put up cannot be raised at this distance of time by the Panchayat and, at any rate, that the lands cannot now be used for cultivation of any paddy or other food crop, I dispose the Writ Petition by directing the petitioners to submit an application for renewal of the building permit, along with a revised plan to support the construction actually made in respect of Unit -- B, before the respondent Panchayat within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. On receipt of the said application from the petitioners, the respondent Panchayat shall consider the same in accordance with the provisions of the Panchayat Raj Act and Rules but without reference to any objection as to the nature of the land. The respondent Panchayat shall pass orders in the matter within six weeks from the date of receipt of the application/revised plan from the petitioners. The fate of the provisional number already allotted in respect of Unit-B pursuant to the interim order of this Court, shall be determined by the order to be passed by the respondent Panchayat pursuant to the directions in this judgment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top