UDAY UMESH LALIT, MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR, VINEET SARAN
Pyare Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
ORDER
Uday Umesh Lalit. J.
The Appellant (original Accused No.1) stands convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer life imprisonment and to other punishments including fine and default sentence under certain other offences. While granting Special Leave to Appeal, this Court by its Order dated 04.07.2017 rejected the prayer for bail. Another application for bail was thereafter preferred and when the application came up for consideration, it was reported that after having completed 8 years of actual sentence and the Appellant being aged above 75 years, in accordance with the existing policy of the State Government, he was prematurely released in 2019. This Court, therefore, called upon the State to file an affidavit indicating whether the policy permitted premature release even before completion of actual sentence of 14 years in connection with an offence punishable under Section 302 IPC.
2. The response filed on behalf of the State Government indicates that on the occasion of the Independence Day i.e., 15th August, 2019, in exercise of powers conferred by Article 161 of the Constitution of India, the Governor of Haryana was pleased
Maru Ram vs. Union of India and others
Gopal Vinayak Godse vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Swaran Singh vs. State of U.P. and others
Epuru Sudhakar vs. Govt. of A.P.
Swaran Singh and Satpal vs. State of Haryana
Bikas Chatterjee v. Union of lndia
State of Haryana and others vs. Jagdish
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.