SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 1383

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R. Banumathi, Indira Banerjee, JJ.
Satish Sakharam Mangle - Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra - Respondent
Criminal Appeal Nos. 1130 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.)NO.6104 of 2018)
Decided On : 06-09-2018

Advocates Appeared:
Satish Maneshinde, Ms. Amrita Panda, Ms. Snehal Khairnar, Ms. Lakshmi Raman, Neil Chatterjee, Nikhil Maneshinde, Debesh Panda, Sadanand Shetty, Advocates, for the Appellants; Ranjit Kumar, Sr.Adv, Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv, Aman Preet Singh Rahi, Ms. V.S. Lakshmi, Rishi Raj Sharma, A. Venayagam Balan, Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, Advocates, for the Respondents

The interests of justice may necessitate the transfer of a case to a different judge despite finding no fault with the original judge's actions.

Headnote:

Transfer of Case - MCOCA Judge - The court held that the transfer of the case from one MCOCA Judge to another was necessary in the interest of justice, despite finding no fault with the original judge's handling of the bail application.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant is in custody for alleged offences under Sections 384, 386, 387 read with 34 I.P.C. and under Sections 3(1)(ii), 3(2) and 3(4) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act 1999 (MCOCA 1999). The issue in-question is the correctness of the order of transfer of the case from one MCOCA Judge to another.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that while there was no fault with the original judge's handling of the bail application, the interests of justice would be served by transferring the case to the senior most MCOCA Judge at Mumbai.

Issues: The correctness of the order of transfer of the case from one MCOCA Judge to another.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the mere zest by a judicial officer in taking up the bail application and expediting the hearing could not be made a ground for transfer, but in the interest of justice, the case should be transferred to the senior most MCOCA Judge at Mumbai.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the case was transferred to the senior most MCOCA Judge at Mumbai with specific directions for expeditious handling of the bail application.

JUDGMENT

Banumathi, J. - Leave granted.

2. The appellant is in custody for the alleged commission of the offence under Sections 384, 386, 387 read with 34 I.P.C. and under Sections 3(1)(ii), 3(2) and 3(4) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act 1999 (MCOCA 1999).

3. The issue in-question in this appeal is the correctness of the order of transfer of case, Special Case bearing NO.1 of 2018, from one MCOCA Judge to another MCOCA Judge at Thane, Maharashtra.

4. We have heard Mr. Satish Maneshinde, learned counsel appearing for the appellants, Mr. Ranjit Kumar, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent/complainant and also Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State. We have considered the impugned order and also the materials on record.

5. Without going into the merits of the matter, we are constrained to observe that the High Court was not right in finding fault with the officer (MCOCA Judge from whom the case was transferred) for trying to expedite the hearing of the bail application. In our view, for mere zest by judicial officer in taking up the bail application and expediting the hearing, no motive could be attributed to the judicial officer. Merely because the officer expedited the hearing, it could not have been made a ground for transfer.

6. However, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, we are of the view that interests of justice would be served by transferring Special Case bearing NO.1 of 2018 pending before the Special Court under the MCOCA at Thane to the senior most MCOCA Judge, Mr. V.S. Padalkar, at Mumbai.

7. This appeal is accordingly allowed with the following directions:

(i) Special Case bearing NO.1 of 2018 pending before the Special Court under the MCOCA Act at Thane (presided over by the Special Judge, S.B. Bahalkar, District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Thane) is transferred to the senior most Judge, Mr. V.S. Padalkar, under the MCOCA at Mumbai.;

(ii) The State of Maharashtra shall ensure issuance of notification within a period of one week from today in this regard, vesting the power upon the senior most Judge under the MCOCA at Mumbai to try Special Case bearing NO.1 of 2018.;

(iii) The senior most Judge under the MCOCA, Mumbai, shall hear the bail application in Special Case bearing No.1 of 2018 expeditiously in accordance with law preferably within one week after the issuance of the notification and dispose of the same within a period of four weeks thereafter.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top