SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 1408

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.A. Bobde, L. Nageswara Rao, JJ.
Madan Mohan - Appellant
Versus
Kamal Parkash Goya - Respondent
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 9059 of 2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-02-2018 in CR No.8144/2017 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)
Decided On : 06-07-2018

Advocates Appeared:
Anand Sanjay M. Nuli, Dharm Singh For M/S. Nuli & Nuli, Advocates, For the Petitioners; Roopansh Purohit, Harsh Panwar, Advocates, For the Respondents

The court has the authority to issue notices, waive service, and stay the operation of impugned orders pending further proceedings.

Headnote:

Stay - Impugned Order - The court issued a notice returnable in four weeks, waived service on one respondent, and stayed the operation of the impugned order pending further proceedings.

Fact of the Case:

The court issued a notice returnable in four weeks, waived service on one respondent, and stayed the operation of the impugned order pending further proceedings.

Finding of the Court:

The court found it necessary to issue a notice, waive service on one respondent, and stay the operation of the impugned order pending further proceedings.

Issues: The issues involved the issuance of notice, waiver of service, and the stay of the impugned order.

Ratio Decidendi: The court decided to issue a notice, waive service on one respondent, and stay the operation of the impugned order pending further proceedings.

Final Decision: The court ordered the issuance of notice, waiver of service on one respondent, and stayed the operation of the impugned order pending further proceedings.

ORDER

1. Issue notice returnable in four weeks.

2. Waive service on respondent no.4 since Mr. Roopansh Purohit, learned counsel, is appearing on its behalf.

3. Let notice be issued to other respondents.

4. In the meantime, there shall be stay of operation of the impugned order (Maan Mohan v. Kamal Parkash Goya, CR No. 8144 of 2017. D/d. 20.02.2018.) passed by the High Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top