ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, NAVIN SINHA
Sourabh Brala – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
ORDER
1. Application for impleadment is allowed.
2. By our order dated 06.12.2018, we had passed certain directions, which have been implemented. During the course of implementation, the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 - College and Trust have brought to our notice that properties which have nothing to do with the Medical College have also been taken over.
3. This is stoutly denied by Mr. Jatinder Kumar Sethi, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand and Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.
4. We, therefore, direct Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 to file a sketch plan indicating specifically as to what exactly is the area of land and buildings together with a list of the assets which are exclusively apportioned to the Medical College.
5. This will be done by way of an affidavit to be filed within a period of one week from today. The other parties may respond to this affidavit within two weeks thereafter.
6. On a query made to Mr. Sethi as to how the land, buildings, immovable and movable assets are to be taken over in accordance with law and compensation therefor be paid, we have been informed by Mr. Sethi that this will be done by an Act/Ordinance of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.