SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1523

PANKAJ BHATIA
Nayeem – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dheeraj Kumar Singh, Ray Sahab Yadav., Advocates, for the Applicant; G.A., for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Pankaj Bhatia, J. - Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri J.P. Mishra, for the informant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

1. Supplementary affidavit filed by the applicant, is taken on record.

2. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in case crime No.430 of 2016, under Sections 326, 354 IPC & 7/8 of POCSO Act, Police Station Shahpur District Muzaffar Nagar with a prayer to enlarge him on bail.

3. Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted by counsel for the applicant that co-accused Istikar @ Istkhar has already been enlarged on bail by coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 8.5.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.36738 of 2018. There is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Lastly, it is submitted that the applicant is in jail since 29.9.2018. It is further submitted that the applicant has no previous criminal history.

4. Learned AGA has oppo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top