SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1819

R.BANUMATHI, R.SUBHASH REDDY
Meghna Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
Aman Mathur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A. Tewari, Adv., Eliza Barr, Adv., Riju Mani Talukdar, Adv., Shree Pal Singh, Adv.

ORDER

1. Alleging wilful and deliberate disobedience of Order of this Court dated 6th September, 2018 by which an ex-parte stay was granted by this Court in Divorce Petition NO.501 of 2018 pending before the Family Judge, Division No.1, Jaipur Mahanagar, Rajasthan, the petitioner-wife has filed this contempt petition. According to the petitioner the official letter was sent by Registry of the Supreme Court to the Family Court on 11th September, 2018 communicating the stay granted by this Court on 6th September, 2018.

2. This Court has granted an ex-parte stay of the proceedings pending before the Family Court. The petitioner claims that the official letter was sent from the Supreme Court only on 11th September, 2018. There is nothing on record to show/suggest that the stay order granted by the Supreme Court has been brought to the notice of the Family Court.

3. In view of above, we do not find any ground to initiate contempt proceedings.

4. It is open to the petitioner either to take steps to set aside the ex-parte decree of divorce by filing necessary application or to challenge the ex-parte decree of divorce passed against her on 3rd October, 2018 by the Family Court in accordanc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top