ARUN MISHRA, NAVIN SINHA
Dy G M(hr)indian Oil Corp Ltd(MD) – Appellant
Versus
Anup Kumar Panda – Respondent
ORDER
1. The case has a chequered history. The respondent - Anup Kumar Panda was appointed as a Junior Operator by the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (in short, "IOCL") by virtue of the fact that the land belonging to his family had been acquired and in terms of the policy, he was entitled to obtain the employment. However, he applied on 21.06.1995 in the capacity of "land loser". He mentioned his Date of Birth as 23.04.1975 and submitted Provisional Certificate of Date of Birth indicating the said date. However, the certificate issued by the Board of Secondary Education on 31.08.1995 reflected his Date of Birth to be 23.04.1979 instead of 23.04.1975.
2. However, by virtue of the application and the Provisional Certificate which was filed, the respondent obtained the employment and joined the services in the capacity of Junior Operator on 26.05.1996. Later on, after approximately 10 years, on 31.10.2005, a complaint was lodged indicating that the Date of Birth of the respondent was recorded in the certificate of Board of Secondary Education as 23.04.1979. Thus, by playing the fraud, the respondent submitted a Provisional Certificate indicating the Date of Birth as 23.04.1975 instead o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.