SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1935

R.BANUMATHI, R.SUBHASH REDDY
Sheila Dhody – Appellant
Versus
Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dhruv Mehta, Adv., Siddharth Naidu, Adv., V. Balachandran, Adv.

ORDER

R. Banumathi, J. - By an order dated 24th August, 2018, the Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority (GCZMA) passed an order of demolition of structures under Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 which was challenged by the petitioner in W.P. No.991/2018 before the High Court. Being aggrieved by another order dated 20 th September, 2018 passed by the said Authority (GCZMA), the petitioner has also filed W.P. No.1069/2018. Both the writ petitions were dismissed by the High Court by a common Order dated 1st December, 2018 by observing that the petitioner is to approach the National Green Tribunal challenging the orders passed against her.

2. The petitioner thereafter filed miscellaneous applications before the High Court seeking extension of time for approaching the National Green Tribunal which were rejected by the High Court by Order dated 28th January, 2019. Both orders i.e. 1st December, 2018 and 28th January, 2019 are impugned in these special leave petitions.

3. Section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act 2010 deals with the appellate jurisdiction of the Tribunal. In terms of Section 16(j) of the said Act any person aggrieved by an order may within a period

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top