SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1944

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.A. Bobde, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Deepak Gupta, JJ.
Shashikala & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Gangalakshmamma & Anr. - Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2836 of 2015
Decided On : 14-02-2019

Advocates Appeared:
Aishwarya Kumar, Adv., Vipin Gupta, Adv., G. Balaji, Adv., M.K. Dua, Adv., Viresh B Saharya, Adv., Yunus Malik, Adv., Anish Maheshwari, Adv., Sanjeev Agarwal, Adv., Arvind S Avhad, Adv., Khushali, Adv., Saroj Bala, Adv., Farha Malik, Adv., Samir Malik, Adv., Garvesh Kabra, Adv., S.D. Raman, Adv., Vijay Kumar, Adv., Vithika Garg, Adv., Vidushi Garg, Adv., C.D. Singh, Adv., Amit Kumar Singh, Adv., K. Enatoli Sema, Adv., Amith J, Adv., K.K. Bhat, Adv., P.K. Seth, Adv., Manjeet Chawla, Adv.

The court's decision emphasized the consideration of future prospects for awarding compensation to a deceased self-employed person, and the calculation of compensation based on income, deductions, and the application of interest.

Headnote:

Compensation - Future Prospects - The court resolved the difference of opinion on whether future prospects should be considered for awarding compensation to a deceased self-employed person, citing the decision in National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi & Ors. The court modified and enhanced the compensation based on the deceased's income and other deductions, and directed the payment of interest at the rate of 9% per annum on the enhanced amount.

Fact of the Case:

The deceased was engaged in transport business, and the court assessed his income and made various deductions to arrive at the loss of dependency. The court modified and enhanced the compensation to Rs.20,80,000 and directed the payment of interest at the rate of 9% per annum.

Finding of the Court:

The court resolved the difference of opinion on considering future prospects for awarding compensation and modified the compensation based on the deceased's income and deductions. The court directed the payment of interest at the rate of 9% per annum and the distribution of the compensation among the claimants.

Issues: Difference of opinion on considering future prospects for awarding compensation, assessment of the deceased's income, deductions, and distribution of compensation among the claimants.

Ratio Decidendi: The court resolved the difference of opinion on considering future prospects for awarding compensation and modified the compensation based on the deceased's income and deductions. The court also directed the payment of interest at the rate of 9% per annum and the distribution of the compensation among the claimants.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the appeal, modified and enhanced the compensation to Rs.20,80,000, and directed the payment of interest at the rate of 9% per annum on the enhanced amount. The court also provided directions for the distribution of the compensation among the claimants.

ORDER

1. This appeal is before three-judge Bench because of difference of opinion between the Hon'ble Judges of this Court. The difference of opinion was only on the issue whether the future prospects are to be taken into consideration for awarding compensation when the deceased is self-employed person. That difference of opinion has been resolved by the Constitution Bench's decision rendered in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi & Ors. , (2017) 16 SCC 680, and that issue is, therefore, no longer alive.

2. As far as the present case is concerned, the deceased viz., H.S. Ravi was aged 46 years and he was engaged in transport business. His income as assessed by the two-Judge Bench of this Court was Rs.2,02,911/-. In terms of the judgment in Pranay Sethi & Ors . ( supra ), twenty five per cent of the income has to be added towards future prospects to the compensation which would come to Rs.50,728/- and thereafter, the income is worked out to Rs.2,53,63 9/-. Ten per cent of the said amount i.e. Rs.25,364/- is deducted towards income tax. Professional tax of Rs.2,400/- and the income from the house property shown to be Rs.20,000/- are also liable to be deducted and after deducting the same, the net amount comes to Rs.2,05,875/-. Deducting 1/4th (one fourth) towards personal expenses which comes out to Rs.51,469/-, the loss of dependency/loss of contribution is arrived at Rs.1,54,406/- per annum. Applying the multiplier of 13, the total loss of dependency is calculated at Rs.20,07,280/-. A sum of Rs.70,000/- has to be added for loss of consortium, f uneral expenses and loss to the estate in terms of the case in Pranay Sethi & Ors . ( Supra ). The award is accordingly modified and enhanced to Rs.20,77,280/- which is rounded off to Rs.20,80,000/-.

3. We also direct that interest at the rate of 9% per annum shall be payable on the aforesaid amount from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of realisation. The enhanced amount shall be paid to the claimants within three months from today.

4. Needless to say that the amount already paid or deposited shall be adjusted while depositing the enhanced compensation awarded by this Court. It is also made clear that after payment of Rs.1,00,000/- to the father of the deceased, the balance amount of compensation shall be shared equally by the other four claimants.

5. With the aforesaid directions, the appeal is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top