ASHOK BHUSHAN, NAVIN SINHA
Nitika – Appellant
Versus
Yadwinder Singh – Respondent
ORDER
Leave granted.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 10.08.2018 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla by which High Court has allowed the Cr.M.M.O. No.12 of 2015 filed by the respondents quashing the First Information Report on the ground that police at Nalagarh had no jurisdiction to enquire into the contents of first information report and as such there is no occasion for the High Court to go into the correctness of the allegation as well as sustainability of charge. In paragraph 44 of the judgment following has been observed by the High Court:
"44. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, as has been discussed above, this Court has arrived at a conclusion that Police at Nalagarh has/had no jurisdiction to enquire into the contents of FIR and as such there is no occasion for this Court to go into the correctness of the allegation as well as sustainability of charge, if any, framed against the petitioners. As has been noticed hereinabove, inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C, is to be exercised sparingly, carefully or with caution and only when such exercise is justified by t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.