SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 464

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, R. SUBHASH REDDY, JJ.
The State Of Meghalaya – Appellant
Versus
Melvin Sohlangpiaw - Respondent
Special Leave To Appeal (Crl.) No.1218 of 2018
Decided on : 11-02-2020

The main legal point established is that the District Council Court has exclusive jurisdiction to entertain criminal cases where both the accused and the victim belong to the same Scheduled Tribe, as conferred by the Governor under the Cr.P.C.

Headnote:

JURISDICTION - TRIBAL AREAS - 6th SCHEDULE - [Sections 302, 201 IPC] - The court discussed the provisions of the 6th Schedule to the Constitution and the conferral of powers under the Cr.P.C. to the District Council Court, concluding that the District Council Court has exclusive jurisdiction to entertain the case as both the accused and the victim belong to the same Scheduled Tribe.

Fact of the Case:

The accused, a member of the Khasi Scheduled Tribe, was being tried for offences under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC. The accused sought transfer of the case to the Court of Judge, Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong, arguing that the case is exclusively triable by the District Council Court.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the District Council Court has exclusive jurisdiction to entertain the case as both the accused and the victim belong to the same Scheduled Tribe, and the Governor had conferred powers under the Cr.P.C. to the District Council Court for the trial of certain criminal offences.

Issues: The central issue was whether the criminal case against the accused is exclusively triable by the District Council Court, considering the provisions of the 6th Schedule to the Constitution.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the provisions of the 6th Schedule and the conferral of powers under the Cr.P.C. to the District Council Court, concluding that the District Council Court has exclusive jurisdiction to entertain the case as both the accused and the victim belong to the same Scheduled Tribe.

Final Decision: The court upheld the transfer of the case to the District Council Court and directed the District Council Court to proceed with the trial and decide the matter on merits within one year from the date of the order.

JUDGMENT :

MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J.

1. The Respondent herein, a member of the Khasi Scheduled Tribe, was being tried for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (‘IPC’) before the Sessions Judge, Nongstoin, West Khasi Hills District. Briefly, the case set up by the prosecution is that a dead body was found lying on the Nondein river bank on 26.03.2017, pursuant to which the Officer in Charge of Police Station, Nongstoin (‘Complainant’) was informed and an FIR was registered by him. Upon investigation, the identity of the deceased person was known, who was also found to be a member of the Khasi Scheduled Tribe. With the use of a SIM card recovered from her body, the last calls made using her number were traced to the Respondent herein (accused). Consequently, the accused was arrested and he voluntarily lead the police to the spot where he had buried the dead body. On 31.08.2017, a chargesheet was filed against him under Sections 302 and 201, IPC. On 08.11.2017, the case was committed for trial to the Court of the Sessions Judge, Nongstoin, West Khasi Hills District and the accused was summoned to appear before it.

However, on the basis that the parties to the instant case are both tribals and thus, the case is exclusively triable by the District Council Court, the accused preferred a petition for transfer of the said case to the Court of Judge, Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong. Vide the impugned judgment dated 05.12.2017, the High Court of Meghalaya, Shillong allowed this petition. The instant SLP has been filed against this order of the High Court.

2. At the very outset, it is important to note that the area where the alleged offence is said to have occurred, West Khasi Hills District, is a notified autonomous district included in the table appended to paragraph 20 of the 6th Schedule to the Constitution of India (‘the Constitution’), which deals with the administration of tribal areas in the States of Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and Tripura. Specifically, the aspect of judicial dispensation in such areas is dealt with under paragraphs 4 and 5 of the 6th Schedule to the Constitution as follows:

    4. Administration of justice in autonomous districts and autonomous regions.—(1) The Regional Council for an autonomous region in respect of areas within such region and the District Council for an autonomous district in respect of areas within the district other than those which are under the authority of the Regional Councils, if any, within the district may constitute village councils or courts for the trial of suits and cases between the parties all of whom belong to Scheduled Tribes within such areas, other than suits and cases to which the provisions of subparagraph (1) of paragraph 5 of this Schedule apply, to the exclusion of any court in the State, and may appoint suitable persons to be members of such village councils or presiding officers of such courts, and may also appoint such officers as may be necessary for the administration of the laws made under paragraph 3 of this Schedule… …(4) A Regional Council or District Council, as the case may be, may with the previous approval of the Governor make rules regulating—

    (a) the constitution of village councils and courts and the powers to be exercised by them under this paragraph;

    (b) the procedure to be followed by village councils or courts in the trial of suits and cases under subparagraph (1) of this paragraph;

    (c) the procedure to be followed by the Regional or District Council or any court constituted by such Council in appeals and other proceedings under subparagraph (2) of this paragraph;

    (d) the enforcement of decisions and orders of such councils and courts;

    (e) all other ancillary matters for the carrying out of the provisions of subparagraphs (1) and (2) of this paragraph.

    x x x

    5. Conferment of powers under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 , on the Regional and District Councils and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top