SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 1410

A.K.SIKRI, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
CCE – Appellant
Versus
Radhaballabh Silk Mills (P) Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. By the impugned order [CCE v. Radhaballabh Silk Mills (P) Ltd., (2006) 203 ELT 238 (Tri)] the Tribunal has classified the goods in question viz. yarn manufactured by the assessee, under Sub-Headings 5402.61 and 5401.62, rejecting the contention of the Revenue that these goods are classifiable under Sub-Headings 5402.31 and 5401.32. These proceedings were initiated as a result of one letter written by the Revenue to the assessee asking the assessee to classify the goods under Sub-Headings 5402.31 and 5401.32. At the same time, we find that the Department had also issued show-cause notice dated 31-3-2001 to classify the goods as textured yarn and the same is still pending adjudication.

2. In view of the fact that the show-cause notice is pending adjudication, we dispose of this appeal with a direction to the adjudicating officer to decide the said show-cause notice. We may point out at this stage that Mr. Yashank Adhyaru, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Revenue has referred to certain material which is mentioned in the memo of appeal and has tried to argue on the basis that this material though was before the Tribunal, the Tribunal did not consider the same. On t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top