A.K.SIKRI, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
CCE – Appellant
Versus
Radhaballabh Silk Mills (P) Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. By the impugned order [CCE v. Radhaballabh Silk Mills (P) Ltd., (2006) 203 ELT 238 (Tri)] the Tribunal has classified the goods in question viz. yarn manufactured by the assessee, under Sub-Headings 5402.61 and 5401.62, rejecting the contention of the Revenue that these goods are classifiable under Sub-Headings 5402.31 and 5401.32. These proceedings were initiated as a result of one letter written by the Revenue to the assessee asking the assessee to classify the goods under Sub-Headings 5402.31 and 5401.32. At the same time, we find that the Department had also issued show-cause notice dated 31-3-2001 to classify the goods as textured yarn and the same is still pending adjudication.
2. In view of the fact that the show-cause notice is pending adjudication, we dispose of this appeal with a direction to the adjudicating officer to decide the said show-cause notice. We may point out at this stage that Mr. Yashank Adhyaru, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Revenue has referred to certain material which is mentioned in the memo of appeal and has tried to argue on the basis that this material though was before the Tribunal, the Tribunal did not consider the same. On t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.