SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, ANIRUDDHA BOSE, KRISHNA MURARI, JJ.
Smt. Renuka Dey and Others – Appellants
Versus
Naresh Chandra Gope (D) through LRs. and Another – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 6264 of 2013
Decided On : 02-11-2020
Restoration of Alienated Land - West Bengal Restoration of Alienated Land Act, 1973 - Section 4(1) - The judgment discusses the applicability of the 1973 Act to a deed of conveyance executed in 1968 and the conditions under which a transferor could seek restoration of conveyed land. The court analyzes the definition of 'land' under the Act and the criteria for invoking the restoration provisions. The judgment also highlights the interpretation of 'distress sale' and the applicability of the Act to nonagricultural land.
Fact of the Case:
The original transferors conveyed land to a purchaser in 1968 and applied for restoration in 1974, citing distress and a reconveyance agreement. The matter had previously reached the High Court, which remanded it to the Special Officer. The restoration order was sustained by the Special Officer and the appellate authority, but was set aside by the High Court on the grounds that the land did not come within the purview of the 1973 Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the reasons cited for the sale constituted distress sale under Section 4(1) of the 1973 Act. However, it upheld the High Court's finding that the nature of the land was never determined by the statutory fora. The court set aside the High Court's finding that the transaction did not constitute distress sale, but agreed that the nature of the land was crucial and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for determination.
Issues: The issues revolved around the applicability of the 1973 Act to a deed of conveyance executed in 1968, the criteria for invoking the restoration provisions, and the nature of the land in question.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the reasons cited for the sale constituted distress sale under Section 4(1) of the 1973 Act. It also emphasized the importance of determining the nature of the land to establish its applicability under the Act.
Final Decision: The appeal was partly allowed, and the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for determination of whether the land came within the purview of the 1973 Act. If the land was found to be covered by the Act, the restoration order would stand revived; otherwise, the deed executed in 1968 would remain effective.
JUDGMENT :
ANIRUDDHA BOSE, J.
1. The West Bengal Restoration of Alienated Land Act, 1973 contemplates, in substance, return of land to a small landholder in a situation such a landholder conveys the same to raise funds to tide over financially distressed condition. For restoration of the conveyed land, the concerned landholder is required to make an application to the authority prescribed under the said statute. We shall refer to that statute henceforth as the 1973 Act. This legislation lays down certain parameters within which a landholder ought to come to invoke the provisions relating to restoration of the land already conveyed by him. The nature of land to which the said Act applies is defined in Section 2(2) of 1973 Act. Under the said provision, land means agricultural land and includes homestead, tank, well and water channel. To be eligible for the protective umbrella of this statute, the aggregate holding of the transferor cannot exceed two hectares. The 1973 Act, as originally framed, applied to any transfer made by a landholder “in distress” or “in need of money for the maintenance of himself and his family” or “for meeting the cost of his cultivation.” There has been subsequent amendment to the Act by which the words “in distress or” has been omitted. In this appeal, we are concerned with a deed of conveyance executed on 26th April, 1968. The transferors of the land forming subject-matter of that deed applied for restoration thereof on 9th August, 1974. At that point of time, the 1973 Act, as originally framed was applicable. Section 4(1) of the Act lays down the conditions under which a transferor could seek restoration of conveyed land. Section 4 of the said statute, as originally enacted, read:
“4. Procedure for effecting restoration of lands alienated under certain circumstances:
(1) Where before the commencement of this Act a person being the transferor holding not more than 2 hectares of land in the aggregate transferred the whole or any part of his land by sale to any person being the transferee, then, if:
(a) such transfer was made after the expiry of the year 1967 being in distress or in need of money for the maintenance of himself and his family or for meeting the cost of his cultivation.
(b) such transfer was made after the expiry of the year 1967 with an agreement written or oral, for reconveyance of the land transferred, to the transferor, the transferor may, within five years from the date of such transfer or within two years, from the date of commencement of this Act, whichever period expires later, make an application in the prescribed manner to the Special Officer having jurisdiction in the area in which the land transferred is situate for restoration of such land to him.
(2) On receipt of such application, the Special Officer shall cause a notice thereof to be served in the prescribed manner on the transferee.
(3) On the date fixed in the notice for hearing such application or on any subsequent date to which the hearing may be adjourned by the Special Officer, the Special Officer shall receive such evidence as may be adduced by the transferor and the transferee.
(4) If after considering such evidence and hearing the parties the Special Officer is satisfied that such transfer was made by the transferor within the time and for the purpose, referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (1), or, as the case may be, within the time, and under the conditions, referred to in clause (b) of that sub-section, the Special Officer shall make an order in writing restoring the land transferred to the transferor and directing the transferor to pay, in such number of equal instalments not exceeding ten and by such dates as may be specified in the order, the amount of the consideration which was actually paid by the transferee to the transferor for such transfer, together with interest on such amount at the rate of four per centum per annum from the date of his receipt of such consideration and the amount of any compensation f
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.