HRISHIKESH ROY
Jatinderveer Arora – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Hrishikesh Roy, J.
These petitions are filed under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "the CrPC") read with Order XXXIX of the Supreme Court Rules seeking transfer of Trial of criminal cases pending before the Courts at Bhatinda, Moga and Faridkot districts to competent Court in Delhi or to any nearby State, out of Punjab.
2.1 Mr. Ranjit Kumar, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits that as the matters relate to alleged sacrilege of the holy book, Shri Guru Granth Sahibji in different places in Punjab, deep anguish and bitterness is generated amongst a particular religious group, who form majority of the population in the State of Punjab and therefore the accused who are members of the Dera Sacha Sauda sect, are facing bias and prejudice and are unlikely to get a fair trial in the face of strong presumption of culpability.
2.2 According to the petitioners, the situation in Bhatinda and other places is communally surcharged where, fair trial is a near impossibility. In support of such contention, the Senior Counsel refers to the m
Maneka Sanjay Gandhi Vs. Rani Jethmalani
Abdul Nazar Madan Vs. State of T.N. & Anr.
R. Balakrishna Pillai Vs. State of Kerala
Zahira Habibullah H. Sheikh Vs. State of Gujarat
Sri Jayendra Saraswathy Swamigal (II), T.N. Vs. State of T.N.
Captain Amrinder Singh Vs. Prakash Singh Badal & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.